Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cidrasm
Bush could have vetoed it, but it would remain a Dem talking point going into this year's election cycle.

Yes, the talking point would have been, "Republicans (except for my friend John McCain, and company) follow the Constitution, and protect your right to free speech. Democrats do not."

That's what's so pathetic about G.W. Bush. He can't take a principled position, and defend it from principle. (For example, he can't say, "Federal spending on education is bad. It's unconstitutional...and it takes money from states and from The People, and gives it to the federal government. Federal spending on education HURTS education.")

295 posted on 03/27/2002 4:14:36 PM PST by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: Mark Bahner
Bush could have vetoed it, but it would remain a Dem talking point going into this year's election cycle.

Yes, the talking point would have been, "Republicans (except for my friend John McCain, and company) follow the Constitution, and protect your right to free speech. Democrats do not."

Guess what, the Republican/conservative message doesn't get out due to the major media outlets, so your "talking point" goes nowhere. The reality of the situation (which apparently you choose to ignore) is that most Americans only know what the major media tells them. For them, the talking point WOULD have been President Bush and the Repubs are against meaningful campaign finance reform.

299 posted on 03/27/2002 4:57:09 PM PST by cidrasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson