Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The press release from the NRA...

NRA First to File Constitutional Challenge to Campaign Finance Law


JOINT STATEMENT BY WAYNE LAPIERRE , EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and JAMES JAY BAKER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NRA'S INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

(Washington, D.C.) --"Early this morning, President Bush signed into law the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA").  When the federal courthouse opened for business today, NRA was there – we have filed suit to invalidate this unconstitutional infringement on the First Amendment rights of the NRA and our four million members nationwide.

We are proud to be the first plaintiff to formally ask the federal court to invalidate these new limits on the political speech of ordinary citizens because we believe that this law cannot be allowed to stand – not even for a moment.

Sen. Paul Wellstone said on the floor of the United States Senate during the campaign finance debate that it was his intention to silence the NRA.  As a direct and intentional target of this law, NRA has no choice but to protect our right to be heard.

NRA has been mentioned by name – but the authors of this law have delivered a clear and straightforward message not only to NRA but to all American citizens.  That message is this: ‘Keep your mouths shut.'  ‘Stay out of our political debates.'  ‘Be quiet.'

Our response is this: the First Amendment protects us from such directives from the government.  The First Amendment does not allow Congress to make laws which deny us the right to speak out on issues, the right of our members to associate together on public policy issues and the right to petition our government for redress of grievances.  That is what this lawsuit is about.

Through this law Congress has essentially granted speech licenses to giant corporate conglomerates such as Viacom, Disney Corporation and General Electric Company by allowing those corporations unlimited rights to spend money talking about issues and candidates, while silencing the voices of ordinary citizens and citizens groups such as NRA.

Why should corporations such as these media conglomerates, all of which own multiple non-news business enterprises and spend millions of dollars lobbying Congress—why should those corporations be allowed to spend whatever they wish, whenever they wish, saying whatever they wish regarding any issue or candidate – when a non-profit citizens organizations such as ours is prohibited from even responding via the broadcast media?

The law imposes severe civil and criminal penalties on citizens who have the audacity to speak out on issues of concern – and we do not believe that the Constitution of the United States of America and the U.S. Supreme Court can possibly allow such a result."

Attorneys for NRA are Charles Cooper, Cooper & Kirk, P.L.L.C. (202) 220-9600 and Cleta Mitchell, Foley & Lardner, (202) 295-4081.  Both are from Washington, D.C.  The docket # for NRA v. FEC is 02-581.


154 posted on 03/27/2002 8:48:44 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
THANKS MUCH FOR THE INFO.
156 posted on 03/27/2002 8:51:10 AM PST by conserve-it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Sen. Paul Wellstone said on the floor of the United States Senate during the campaign finance debate that it was his intention to silence the NRA.

Why did you sign this bill Mr President??? These same people wanted to silence your supporters during the algore coup attempt but had no legal way to do it. Now with your pen you give your enemies a legal weapon to use against you and your allies!

189 posted on 03/27/2002 9:41:34 AM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson