Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs Campaign Reform, NRA Sues
AP/Yahoo ^ | 03/25/02 | SCOTT LINDLAW

Posted on 03/27/2002 7:10:33 AM PST by PeteF

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-328 next last
To: MassExodus
No matter what, Bush won't get another Conservative on the Supreme Court unless he gets the Senate back. Look what they did to Pickering!

Bush has his eye on November and frankly, that's where our eyes should be as well. CFR is going to be struck down by the court and due to the expedition clause in the bill, it may even happen before November.

41 posted on 03/27/2002 7:30:24 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PeteF
Go NRA, Go. You just guaranteed my continued membership. Makes up for backing that land-grab legislation out west.
42 posted on 03/27/2002 7:32:04 AM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I'm sure he's on his way to your house right this minute; start packing!
43 posted on 03/27/2002 7:32:40 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
"They were too stoned for an early morning filing."

BRWAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAA, The worst part is...You're probably correct

44 posted on 03/27/2002 7:32:41 AM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
What are you afraid of---other people's freedom of speech? Freedom of speech is like campaign money---it flows no matter how you try to stop it.
45 posted on 03/27/2002 7:33:10 AM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BigTime
But they can't respond to the quesiton of how, precisely, this will help the conservative cause.

Hard money is increased from $1,000 to $2,000 per donor, per candidate.

The GOP has TWICE as many hard money donors as the Democrats.

46 posted on 03/27/2002 7:33:27 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dasher
No it's NOT. It's the latter. Listen, the Dems are already on record saying this is only the first step towards their ultimate goal which is public financing of campaigns. If Bush vetoed, the issue would become even more front and center (at least with the media and the Congress, not with the people) than it is already. A firm ruling by the SCOTUS will put the brakes on the entire agenda. It is the best and most effective way to stopping it. The bill stinks, Bush knows it, and this is the best route to proving it.
47 posted on 03/27/2002 7:33:32 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PeteF
Everybody should be happy.....lawyers are already making money on this issue.....gotta love the spineless jellyfish called politcians.
48 posted on 03/27/2002 7:34:24 AM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
No matter what, Bush won't get another Conservative on the Supreme Court unless he gets the Senate back.

Flipping Jeffords was all about the courts.

If the GOP wants to hold a Senate majority, they better make sure they do so with more than a three seat margian or more RINO's will flip it right back to the Clinton Machine.
49 posted on 03/27/2002 7:34:26 AM PST by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Yeah, no kidding! The speed with which this took place is astonishing. Way to go NRA!!
50 posted on 03/27/2002 7:34:33 AM PST by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BigTime
I would offer one tidbit for your digestion: when Bush took control, "we" held both houses and yet we're still the ones that have to compromise our principles in the interest of maintaining power.

How many times do I have to teach you newbies the facts of political life. You dont dont control the Senate with 51 votes. You cant get permission to sneeze in the Senate without 60 votes. Any single member can hold up any bill or any appointment unless you can get sixty senators to vote with you on stopping the filbuster. The same thing is true to a lesser extent in the House. Gingrich had much more fun and success as being the minority guy that got to throw a wrench into the works and prevent legislation from passing. A tough minority can stop legislation but a numerical majority doesnt ensure its passage.

Being in the majority did help from the standpoint of chairing the various committes giving you some discretion on when to schedule meetings, etc. But that was lost with Jeffords betrayal.

Raw numbers such as having 318 in the House or 51 in the Senate dont mean you have a majority. As soon as you all learn that, perhaps you will get out and vote some more Republicans in.

51 posted on 03/27/2002 7:34:37 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
What is Bush's agenda?
52 posted on 03/27/2002 7:34:43 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Hence the ";^)"...
53 posted on 03/27/2002 7:35:11 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RamsNo1
????
54 posted on 03/27/2002 7:35:22 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
party pooper ,can't we spend the day reading I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR BUSH AGAIN posts?????? I need to send in the hubbys NRA dues I knew they would get in the fight!
55 posted on 03/27/2002 7:35:28 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Did you smoke your breakfast this morning?
56 posted on 03/27/2002 7:37:20 AM PST by rko1933
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I can guarantee you that President Bush speaks to Mitch McConnell and the NRA and was well aware, and probably working with them on what should be removed from this bill.
57 posted on 03/27/2002 7:37:28 AM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PeteF
Bush just lost my vote!
58 posted on 03/27/2002 7:38:08 AM PST by arly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
And for all of those who are threatening NOT to vote for Bush because of this, why don't you give it some time to see what happens BEFORE you do anything rash.

It's all bluster. When Howard Phillips is the alternative in 2004, we'll see how much outrage is still in the pipeline.

59 posted on 03/27/2002 7:38:33 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PeteF
GO NRA. Kick McCain's, Bush's, Carl LEnin's, Debbie Stabusall's, and Feingold's asses.
60 posted on 03/27/2002 7:38:44 AM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson