Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demnomo
Regarding your post #68. Sorry, Pillars makes perfect sense to me. I don't think you're really responding to what Pillars typed so much as what you think he/she meant. And after reading Pillars post several times, I don't think he/she meant it the way you are interpretting the words.

Just a thought.

78 posted on 03/26/2002 3:36:23 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
And after reading Pillars post several times, I don't think he/she meant it the way you are interpretting the words.

Possibly, but I don't think that this type of massacre should be used to justify or excuse any husband or wife who have been abused to cause such pain and suffering to innocent family members.

Yes, there are a lot more women who want to wear the pants in the family today. No matter what NOW or other modern women believe, women trying to control the family can make most men insecure and confused about whether or not they are real men. It also makes some men not care anymore about being good providers, husbands and fathers because they have been brainwashed to believe that they should feel guilty for taking the reigns (male subjugators!) and not letting the women do it all!

Yes, there are some truly heinous governmental cases involving divorce and personal values that have unfairly caused havoc for some families. (I'm fighting for a San Juan Homeschool family who is being harassed by their son's former public school!)

But using these sorts of incidents as an excuse for the sort of behavior that happened in Merced is stretching it, IMHO.

88 posted on 03/26/2002 4:09:33 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson