[flyervet]

Your kidding, right? Trying to prove this to you, whoever you are, does not rise to the level of exposing that kind of personal information, even through email.

If you aren't willing to back up your claims with proof, you shouldn't make them. Period.

You can accept or reject it as it stands. Ask around though, you might get educated. It is, in fact, quite common, in a relative way. The courts can justify some of the most inane decisions I've ever seen on flimsy heresay. Happens all the time.

If it happens all the time, then there should be no problem proving it happens, right?

[RobRoy]

If you aren't willing to back up your claims with proof, you shouldn't make them. Period.

That's one of the silliest assertions I have heard on FR

Baloney, bologna, Use google yourself. I only have so much time to invest here. Just like in my work, some tasks justify more thouroughness than others. To me, this doesn't. You may disagree, and that is fine. But it's my time and my choice. Deal with it. You wanna know this stuff, do some research, don't just resort to "I don't buy that."

I repeat, this doesn't rise to that level for me. You, on the other hand, may choose, and have chosen, to refues to believe it without sources. That is your right and choice.