and they go on to amplify "dispose of" in relation to euthenasia etc. correct. But where do they claim the such disposal can be made to violate what in the previous paragraph they refer to as a prohibition? I don't get it.
As OWK and others have suggested, the initial voluntary act would render the future subjugation and captivity of the slave voluntary as well. That's how indentured servitude worked prior to our 13th Amendment.
You have their platform statement, you've seen their attempts at justification in this thread.
All rights are inextricably linked with property rights. Such rights as the freedom from involuntary servitude as well as the freedom of speech and the freedom of press are based on self-ownership. Our bodies are our property every bit as much as is justly acquired land or material objects.
We further hold that the owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others.
and they go on to amplify "dispose of" in relation to euthenasia etc. correct.
But where do they claim the such disposal can be made to violate what in the previous paragraph they refer to as a prohibition? I don't get it.
You lost me here. What prohibition?
I suspect that once again, some concept is being taken out of overall context, and misunderstood.