Your snideness and sarcasm serves no useful purpose, but as to your points ... Al Gore is not an idiot, he's just a horrible political candidate; if he were to learn some lessons from last time about what to do and what not to do, I'd be much more afraid to run against him than Hillary ... can you give me mathematical evidence where Hillary getting one woman's vote out of every 50 will mean slaughter for the GOP ... and I submit that a lot of the moderate folks who voted for Gore and Slick -- not everybody who voted for them was a raving left-wing fanatic, I personally know people who voted for Reagan in '80 and '84 who voted for Clinton in '92 and '96 -- will be scared off by Hillary, because you can dress her up and smooth her rough edges, but you still have, basically, a harridan and a harpy and an obvious radical ... and as far as shrewd campaigns, she's only run one and I didn't think it was all that shrewd.
Look, I don't like arguing with someone who I'm on the same side with ... but you give this woman too much credit and look at her with way too much fear.
GB--- Go here:
http://freedom.orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/rlkocher_index.htm
And read the four-part series on Hillary Clinton Must Be Stopped.
If Hillary can keep the press at bay for a whole Presidential run, she has a shot. I don't think she can do that, but I didn't think she'd be able to do it in New York either.
I think there is a certain segment who, although disliking Hillary, will vote for her simply to watch US implode.