And if it is unconstitutional, which I presume it is, and so does Bush, the Supreme Court will say that.
"There ought to be limits to Free Speech."
George W. Bush-1999
Why would he now change his mind on the Free Speech issue?
Howlin, since, as you say, we don't KNOW that its unconstitutional, let me ask you this.
Is the part of the bill in question something Bush REALLY doesn't want to see, even if it is constitutional? If not, then isn't Bush taking an awful chance if he signs the bill because it might then remain law. There are, afterall, lots of things that are probably constitutional that conservatives like us (and Bush?) wouldn't want to see become law. Is he going go let the courts decide them all?