Replies

Ah, yes, he does. But he does NOT, nor does anyone ELSE, have the right to shout at me, call me names or anything else.

And by the way, Ricky, if you haven't heard, or haven't asked, a majority of the people out there that voted for President Bush are SATISFIED with the signing of the CFR Bill. Most people do want some sort of restrictions place on the soft money contributions.

I have noticed however, when I ask, that because the media does not focus on the RESTRICTION OF FREE SPEECH issue (because it promotes their agenda, of course) most people don't have a clue about it. Therefore, if you think about it logically, when they hear that this part of the bill will be given to SCOTUS to review, it will be a big surprise to THEM that the RATS even wanted this from the very beginning.

Now think about this: how many of the media outlets have given much time to the CFR Bill since it has been passed? Not many. I've not heard/read anything about it on the cable outlets. What does that tell you? It tells me that the media can't use this as a Bush-bashing item, because there's simply nothing there for them to bash. We may not agree with what the President is doing, however, in the end, it will work out the way it's suppossed to, Ricky.

I know that you believe that SCOTUS will bail George W out of the mess he's about to make for himself and us.

The problem I have is twofold.

1. I'm not betting my childrens heritage on a handful of SEMI Constitutionally minded people

to strike DOWN a law that 2 other branches have signed into law.

They don't OFTEN do that you know, do you think CNNNBCCBSABCMSNBC are going to HELP them explain their actions ?

Isn't the measure of a President who he puts on the Supreme Court ?

How easy will it be for "W" to land a Conservative Constitutionalist judge on a Supreme Court which just struck DOWN the media's baby ?

Think of THAT yet ?

2. On what has been a marvelous and effective forum for which I've devoted time, money and energy over the last 3 years,

I'm noticing a very disturbing trend of what were formerly solid, principled patriots becoming the WORST sort of pragmatic political fascists.

All out of FEAR that voicing an opposition might be detrimental to what are 85 + approval ratings.

Sadly and typically, the RINOs aren't even being politically SMART in their treacherous gambling.

Unless of course, their stated goal is NOT in fact what we're being told.