Ahhhh. So there it is. Even if the documentation is up to par with other ancient historical facts, the behavior of persons ancilliary to the story shows radical change after the event, and no reliable counter documentation has been produced, the event will not be believed because it is "unrealistic".
It is amazing to see the mental hoops which people will jump through in order to hold onto a worldview. Luke 16:31.
Stuart, I have found you to be more pleasant than other skeptics on this forum; but at a certain point skepticism becomes a silly parody of sophistication. I pray that you stop refusing to see. It does wonders for blindness.
Look, we're talking about the only human in the history of mankind that has claimed to come back from the dead. This is not in the same league as when some ancient battle was fought, or some king ruled. Please tell me what is as realistic as resurrection. We have battles today, we have rulers today, we have historical events that are at least believable. What is so believable about rising from the dead?