No, they are paraphrased from quotes that came from the "Republican crap not stinketh." faction here on FR.
I am sure you recognized every one of them as they are repeated over and over every day.
I always look at the "whys"
And I have conculded that it's so The House, Senate and Dubya himself won't look "bad" in the media by defending our Constitution.
There you go. You don't like what I am saying and try to make yourself feel better by writing me off as someone who is incapable of saying anything good about Dubya.
I have said many good things about him actually, but it's getting harder and harder to do because he keeps selling us down the river. I voted for him in 2000, but it doesn't look like I will in 2004.
Not at this rate. You see, unlike you I don't think anyone "deserves" my vote. They have to earn it.
If McDonalds told you they deserve your money you would laugh at them. and then turn right around and scold others for not blindly supporting your guy.
I saw that lame attempt at an analogy on another thread it makes no more sense on this one that it did on the other. Now here is my position just so we are clear
I don't care if you vote for Bush or not and am not trying to change your mind
When I read the McConnell analysis earlier I stated that the bill is bad and that Bush should veto it
I like analysis and the possible reasons for why the Administration may be doing this but I am not projecting them onto Bush as his motives.
I believe in the framework the Founders put in place to handle the laws that we must obey or be protected from
I don't like people that cannot argue from facts and confuse debate with taking the most extreme position possible and then demanding that someone else prove them wrong
I also don’t really care if Bush is re-elected or not. I will vote for him but we will survive if he is not.