Posted on 03/24/2002 7:10:59 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
The Boy Scouts are right. There is no calling to sacred to keep gay pedophiles from their obsession. The recent revelations about Catholic priests is just another chapter in a growing body of evidence that homosexuality is not a "normal" human activity, rather it is obsessive in its victimization and recruitment of the young.
What all this means is that homophobes are justified in their fears. In fact, it is very likely that homophobia has its roots in molestation. How many young boys have had their faith in God, their trust in the scouts, their confidence in adults, shattered by a grim experience?
How many gays were coerced into the lifestyle through molestation? How many had an involuntary first sexual experience at the hands of someone they trusted? How many gays are gay only because they know no other sexual experience and fear heterosexuality?
Homophobes should feel no guilt, in fact, they should feel more vigilent, based on the most recent revelations that only add more fuel to the fire.
Fetish? What, exactly, do you mean by "fetish"?
A bit of history: Harvey Milk was an openly-gay Supervisor in San Francisco. He was gunned down (along with Mayor Moscone) by Dan White. (I'm sure you all remember the famous "twinkie defense".)
I didn't know there was a school in New York named after Harvey Milk. Fitting that the head of the school would make such a statement.
That's it I starting my own religion. Same God. Better comandments.
Hehehe… Nice comeback, I’ve never heard that one before; did you make it up on your own?
So let me get this right?
Bestiality should be against the law?
Incest should be against the law?
Perversion should be against the law?
I hear they too wanted to regulate what sort of sex consenting adults had in their home.
You really are a little dim aren’t you? Silly rabbit, sex is not sodomy but you can pretend it is if you want to.
You are correct. The terms clustered around "homophobe" are actually propagandistic cant with a slander employed as a roorback folded in. Nasty, nasty usage -- and calculatedly so. I agree with you, that conservatives and other rationalists should shun that language as contaminated and defiling.
Exactamento. Rock Hudson was fond of boys.....someone who worked with him on various Westerns he shot in Mexico, would come to his agent every now and then saying that he couldn't stand it any more (that's that suffering referred to above), he just had to have a boy!
And so a Mexican boy would be procured at an agreed-upon price, with the agent doing the haggling (he said on-camera it was one of the most unpleasant things he'd ever done), and in due course Hudson would get his boy.
Thus the interview on syndicated television.
Whoop! There it is.
Sick, sick, sick…All the PeePee(People for Perversion) Liberaltarians will stand up and applaud this since it’s in the privacy of their own bedroom. You can see they’re unopposed to decriminalizing incest and bestiality, pedophilia would seem to be a logical next step.
Why would you care, in your perfect Liberaltarian world of decriminalized
it wouldn’t matter if she was doing her mother and Buddy at the same time.
You’re seriously a sick person, get help.
Nope sex is coitus, not sodomy.
So if Clinton had had anal sex with Monica and then tried to deny a sexual relationship, you'd be defending his honesty and integrity.
Wrong again, if you had paid attention he said “sexual relations,” a term of art that means coitus. But I wouldn’t expect anyone who thinks decriminalizing
to understand the finer points of right and wrong.
Sounds like you aspire to his philosophy of what his definition of ‘is’ is, you have to pull hard to connect me to him...hehehe
Personally, I think you're both wrong.
Thinking’s not your strong suit, is it? It does however nicely demonstrate your limited mental capacity to use a dictionary, maybe you should write your own with your own personal definitions, it might help your short comings.
And I wonder how long after you understand what you've said you'll continue to hold the view.
I’ve had this debate several times before but usually the other person realizes their error and concedes. It’s fun to string it out though, it gives me more opportunity to remind everyone about your hysterical liberal views.
|
supports decriminalizing Incest Bestiality Perversion |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.