Posted on 03/24/2002 7:10:59 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
The Boy Scouts are right. There is no calling to sacred to keep gay pedophiles from their obsession. The recent revelations about Catholic priests is just another chapter in a growing body of evidence that homosexuality is not a "normal" human activity, rather it is obsessive in its victimization and recruitment of the young.
What all this means is that homophobes are justified in their fears. In fact, it is very likely that homophobia has its roots in molestation. How many young boys have had their faith in God, their trust in the scouts, their confidence in adults, shattered by a grim experience?
How many gays were coerced into the lifestyle through molestation? How many had an involuntary first sexual experience at the hands of someone they trusted? How many gays are gay only because they know no other sexual experience and fear heterosexuality?
Homophobes should feel no guilt, in fact, they should feel more vigilent, based on the most recent revelations that only add more fuel to the fire.
I have no idea what causes homosexuality...I have seen people on this thread, state absolutely, that all homosexuals are that way, because they were abused by another homosexual, and that they know no other way...
Some people believe homosexuality is a choice, some believe its genetic and that one has no choice...
Some people want to believe that almost all homosexuals are also pedophiles(but seem to run for cover when its brought up that many heterosexual men abuse little girls, or state that even tho men may abuse little girls, they are usually family members and this is harder to root out...small consolation for those little girls abused by strangers)
Everyone has their own opinion, and are entitled to it...
For me, the issue has always been to protect my children from any pedophile, homosexual or heterosexual...I always told my boys, that if ever, any man or any woman, ever touched them in an inappropriate place, that they must come and tell me about it...And I always emphasized that it did not matter who the abusing person might be...whether it was a teacher, a minister, a friends parents, a cub scout leader, a neighbor, a relative or a bum on the street....
I trusted no one when it came to my kids...I was not paranoid, nor did I try to make my boys paranoid...I just simply and matter of factly explained to them, that there are bad and evil people out in the world, people who harm and abuse children...I told them most people are good, and would not harm them, but they must be ever watchful, be ever careful, and realize that as their mom, I would protect them, and believe them if they came to me with the truth...
Its a hard job to keep ones children safe...and I would probably try to kill anyone who tried to sexually abuse my children...And whether the abuser was a homosexual or a heterosexual makes absolutely no difference to me..
post#171 EdReform is the one posting information on how great anal sex is.
....and that's a blatant LIE!
Yep, that’s pretty much what thought, your moral principle sounds a little relative if you ask me. You’re sick to think incest and bestiality should be legal, I suspected as much. Perhaps you’re better suited for Amsterdam, have fun.
EdReform quotes an example of the kind of filthy,twisted pornographic reading material mainstream homosexual groups such as GLSEN and PFLAG have made available to middle and high school-aged kids in the public schools. Parents who I've spoken with are shocked to learn that such material exists for kids that age.
For those who missed the thread - decide for yourself:
....why don't you try reading the intire post?
"Advice offered to teenagers in Young, Gay and Proud!....I'll repeat that in case you missed it
*Advice offered to teenagers in Young, Gay and Proud!*
I'm sure he probably READ the books!
Anyway, it is an interesting story. It reinforces my premise that alot of the homosexual/pedophile priests entered the priesthood to runaway from their homosexuality.
....bye bye or should I say ta ta?
Evidently you don't understand it.
Sometimes we see arguments eschewing any use of police force against many such crimes and misdemeanors. "Do you want to go so far as murdering someone who smokes crack?! 'Cause that's just what will happen if the crack smoker refuses to comply with the police: they kill 'im! You want that?! You prepared to do that?! To go that far?!" It's really a non-argument. Smoking crack, as an example, is not an automatic death-by-cop sentence.
My point was about force, not death. Moving things back to the topic of the thread, laws against sodomy involve punishments, right? So you're talking about kidnapping or fining a sodomite. These not only have to be enforced by force, they are force. Since sodomy isn't a crime, but a different kind of sin, force against a sodomite is a crime of its own.
Everyone is responsible for their own actions, as conservatives believe. Only whiney liberals try to excuse every evil act as the supposed fault of society somehow.
I know that you exist in a half-hallucinogenic fog at all times and try to make allowences, but this is silly. Have I blamed society for anything, let alone homosexuality? In fact, the one blaming society for it is you, by making it society's fault for not punishing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.