Homophobia and Pedophilia -- Joined at the Hip

Recent reports | 3/24/02 | HMV

[Hillary'sMoralVoid]

The Boy Scouts are right. There is no calling to sacred to keep gay pedophiles from their obsession. The recent revelations about Catholic priests is just another chapter in a growing body of evidence that homosexuality is not a "normal" human activity, rather it is obsessive in its victimization and recruitment of the young.

What all this means is that homophobes are justified in their fears. In fact, it is very likely that homophobia has its roots in molestation. How many young boys have had their faith in God, their trust in the scouts, their confidence in adults, shattered by a grim experience?

How many gays were coerced into the lifestyle through molestation? How many had an involuntary first sexual experience at the hands of someone they trusted? How many gays are gay only because they know no other sexual experience and fear heterosexuality?

Homophobes should feel no guilt, in fact, they should feel more vigilent, based on the most recent revelations that only add more fuel to the fire.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

Can we hunt everybody who wears perfume we don't like, or do we need to get a license first?

[Oschisms]

All right, I'm calling- show me where I compared .0001% and .00001 in my post. Show me that and explain specifically why my math is wrong- excepting the point that Dimensio raised.

[Brad’s Gramma]

bttt to answer later when my finger stops bleeding and I can type w/2 hands

[mcsparkie]

All this statistical agonizing is unnecessary. All homosexuals are "initiated" via pedophilia. That makes the incidence of homosexual pedophilia far greater than the incidence of homosexuality.

[Cultural Jihad]

The objective is to desensitize the public to its revulsion against homosexuality by having people constantly talking about it in a neutral or supportive manner.

Especially the children. The sexual deviants think they loathe themselves because all of society is saying their deeds are evil, but really their self-loathing comes solely from within their own consciences. They erroneously think that if only everyone were to tell them how wonderful their perversion is, then they would be able to feel good about themselves. Even if they can propagandize enough people into accepting and praising their perversion, there is still going to be an upcoming generation in 20 years, and they're going to be as disgusted by it as most people are today, and all these battles will have to be fought all over again, and hence the perverts are ultimately not going to win.

[Oschisms]

Actually these female teacher teenage boy rape reports mystify me- there was none of that going on in my HS. Certainly there was male teacher teenage girl rape, though.

[concerned about politics]

Can we hunt everybody who wears perfume we don't like, or do we need to get a license first?

No. Go ahead and wipe crap on your face, and be a proud anal worshiper if it'll make you feel better. I'm sure the homosexuals would love you too. If you're not queer, I sure hope you're a fast runner.

[LarryLied]

No expectant mother is ever going to wish for a homosexual child. No father is ever not going to be disappointed if his child turns out to be a homosexual. You are right, they are fighting a battle they can't win. It is masochist. They want people to look down on them.

[concerned about politics]

Wow, you scare me, I pity you, to go that far out of the way to express how you feel about a bunch of people you don't know personally really says a lot about yourself. I think you hate yourself just as much as you hate everyone else. Go ahead and flame me, I expect it from you, given what you have posted so far.

Funny how so many here scream about Bush passing CFR. They say it prohibits free speach.

[Dimensio]

"are obsessed with the subject"

Yeh..and those who oppose abortions really want one. Those who buy a red car really secretly want a blue one. That argument is getting old. It doesn't work.

I'm not arguing that they are homosexuals themselves. I'm arguing that many seem to have an unhealthy obsession with the concept of anal sex. What reason there is for their obsession is unknown -- but I'm not suggetsing that it's neccessarily (or even likely) that they are closet homosexuals themselves.

Fags are fags. Mutants, and nothing more. Not male, not female. Mental "Its"
There should be a hunting season. Discusting smelly people they are.

For example, you seem utterly fixated on the issue. You have an unhealthy hatred for them, suggesting that there should be a "hunting" season and calling them "Discusting smelly people". I'm not suggesting that you're homosexual yourself (I'd have to know the workings of your mind to make such a claim), but your statements do suggest an unhealthy obsession with the subject.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

"Go ahead and wipe crap on your face, and be a proud anal worshiper if it'll make you feel better." See! Eventually everyone comes round to libertarianism.

[Dimensio]

No. Go ahead and wipe crap on your face, and be a proud anal worshiper if it'll make you feel better. I'm sure the homosexuals would love you too. If you're not queer, I sure hope you're a fast runner.

Do you honestly think that this is what homosexuals do? Have you ever even met a homosexual?

[Calculus_of_Consent]

Actually these female teacher teenage boy rape reports mystify me- there was none of that going on in my HS

Not at my high school either. Darn it!

[Dimensio]

All homosexuals are "initiated" via pedophilia.

Funny, most of the homosexuals I've met never had any experiences with "pedophilia" that they've mentioned. I've met one or two with such an unpleasant experience -- but then I've met about the same number of heterosexuals who can say the same.

What is your evidence for your sweeping assertion?

[Oschisms]

Well, the disproportionate number of male victims would seem to indicate that we should take down the big guns first...

[ConsistentLibertarian]

You lost track of the thread too? Try working backwards, say from #'s 55, 53, 40, 32. "explain specifically why my math is wrong- excepting [the other mistake I made]." The difference between 1 and 100 is two orders of magnitude.

[Dimensio]

Let them get a picture of me and all hell might break loose.

Six months ago I would have spotted this statement and called it humour. After seeing some of the kooks who post on FR (and before anyone accuses me of anything, I'll state that the "kooks" are a very small minority of the posters here) I can no longer state with 100% certainty that your comment is not intended to be regarded seriously.

[Dimensio]

Well, the disproportionate number of male victims would seem to indicate that we should take down the big guns first...

Perhaps -- but it does bring up the question of how many "big guns" are there and whether a homosexual is any more likely to be a "gun" than a heterosexual (nevermind the size thereof...and someone is going to make a sexually-allegorical comment about "guns" now, I'm sure of it)