To: Mercuria; lowbridge; SUSSA; Demidog; tpaine; Triple; Matsuidon;
FYI: Just bringing Emerson "up to date."
To: betty boop
3 posted on
03/23/2002 11:06:52 AM PST by
Lurker
To: betty boop
4 posted on
03/23/2002 11:07:00 AM PST by
Lurker
To: Demidog; tpaine; Iron Jack
May I please have your interpretation of Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 1? To me, it is the most obscure text in the Constitution. What I'm interested in getting at is, now that citizens in Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana have a federally recognized personal right under the Second Amendment, what, if anything, happens with the citizens of the other 47 if the Supreme Court decides not take Emerson's case? What would be their status under the Second Amendment, going forward? And would that be consonant with Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 1? Thanks, guys -- bb.
To: betty boop
That article is incorrect. Kopel is not the Tennessee law professor--Glenn Reynolds is. I don't know which of them they're quoting there, but I suspect that it's Professor Reynolds.
To: betty boop;
Bump for an update sooner or later.... (In Re: the government's May 6 brief in support of denying Emerson's petition for certiorari)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson