Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shethink13
Would you happen to have the statistics as to how much money was returned to union members during the year when the original EO by Bush Sr was signed? I don't have them myself, but I would be willing to bet it is so puny as to be totally insignificant.

The point is that Beck actually gave Union members prior restraint over paying their dues without the threat of losing membership. Beck stated that 79% of his dues were being used for support of the DNC and won the right to withhold 79% of his dues until the situation was corrected to his satisfaction. That has more direct impact than on the union than after the fact authorization.

222 posted on 03/23/2002 10:59:32 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
That has more direct impact than on the union than after the fact authorization.

As I understand it, paycheck protection would come PRIOR to the authorization. The union leaders would have to get permission from each individual member BEFORE they spend the money.

229 posted on 03/24/2002 9:56:57 AM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson