Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RamsNo1
Full disclosure is in the final draft of the bill. Read it. What bush did was recind a Clinton EO that literally unconstitutionally overturned a Supreme Court decision. That took Paycheck protection off the table as a sore point. Look, I don't like CFR OR the 245I part of the immigration Reform Act. I have sent my e-mails voicing my opposition BUT I also despise the agendas going on around here for the last two weeks over these issues. The misrepresentation and downright lies being told about what Bush said or what he promised or what he believes cannot go unanswered or the entire site looks like a bunch of raving pitchfork wielding bumpkins. Make no mistake this site is known to the Whitehouse and when it sees its positions distorted beyond all recognition they will not listen to a word we say and it sure as hell does not “scare“ them. If you have the facts to back your position the embellishment is not required.
201 posted on 03/23/2002 9:11:18 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
The torture of Bushbology.

"Is" was simple.

"Bush will sign a bill that he thinks is unconstitutional on the theory that the courts will throw it out, even though his administration will have to argue that they shouldn't throw it out, even though the administration really wants the courts to throw it out."

Just cross out Clinton's name and put in Jorge Bush. Illegal amnesty

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Illegal amnesty

Government News Keywords: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, SOVEREIGNTY
Source: The Pittsburgh Tribune Review
Published: Thursday, October 26, 2000 Author: editorial
Posted on 10/26/2000 07:27:11 PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

President Bill Clinton is demonstrating his disdain for the responsibility of U.S. citizenship by promoting legislation that would award amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. Joined by congressional Democrats, Mr. Clinton would simply allow those individuals who broke the law in entering this country to be forgiven their transgressions.

So adamant is Clinton about the amnesty that he is willing to tie up the federal budget over the issue. Clinton has attached the amnesty measure to appropriations legislation, obscuring the amnesty issue from public hearings and providing no opportunity for any study of its impact.

But the amnesty cheapens the efforts of those millions who have immigrated to this country by legal means and have become constructive citizens. It would reward lawlessness and subterfuge and add a tremendous financial burden to border states. According to one study, the net cost of a similar amnesty in 1986 was more than $78 billion.

Even worse, an amnesty would spark another wave of illegal immigration. It's estimated that 3 million illegal immigrants poured across the borders after the 1986 amnesty.

Tying the amnesty to federal appropriations is a political ploy designed to appeal to immigrant voters in those border states. But those voters should see through the Democrats' posturing and demand diligent control of our borders.

The United States always has welcomed the teeming masses, yearning to be free. But the nation has a duty to make sure that those who enter are willing to accept the responsibility of that freedom. Granting amnesty to those who have ignored the law of the land mocks that freedom.

"President of the United States Wants To Grant Amnesty Up To 4 Million Illegal Aliens"

AN AMNESTY BY ANY OTHER NAME IS STILL AN AMNESTY


A DAY IN THE LIFE OF GEORGE W. BUSH

Statement by the President

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002
Statement by the President

Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system. The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.

The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions. I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.

###

Return to this article at:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020320-21.html


The George W. Bush Lie

ABC News's This Week on January 23, 2000:

GEORGE F. WILL: I want to see if you agree with those who say it would be bad for the First Amendment? I know you're not a lawyer, you say that with some pride, but do you think a president, and we've got a lot of non-lawyer presidents, has a duty to make an independent judgment of what is and is not constitutional, and veto bills that, in his judgment, he thinks are unconstitutional?

GOV. BUSH: I do.

GEORGE WILL: In which case, would you veto the McCain-Feingold bill, or the Shays-Meehan bill?

GOV. BUSH: That's an interesting question. I — I — yes I would.
Source

LIAR - George W. Bush


George W. Bush: No Amnesty for Immigrants - "There's going to be no amnesty"

Bush says he won't legalize illegal immigrants

Bush Administration Wants to Extend Immigration "Amnesty"

Bush Proposing "Amnesty" for Illegal Aliens

INS Commissioner James Ziglar addressed a meeting of the National Immigration Forum on Friday, where he reiterated the Bush administration's support for an amnesty benefiting illegal aliens from Mexico and support for the Section 245(i)

Immigration "Amnesty" Passes House - Fox News

Congress OKs "Amnesty" for Illegal Aliens

House clears "amnesty" bill under pressure from Bush

President Bush yesterday called on the Senate to pass a bill that would grant "amnesty" to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens

Darkness By Design For "Amnesty" Move

"There are more than 500,000 undocumented immigrants in the country who are eligible to become legal permanent residents" - George W. Bush

AMNESTY by BUSH - The Truth about Section 245(i)

INS Memo: Sec. 245(i) filings

Section 245 of the Act allows an alien to apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident (LPR) while in the United States if certain conditions are met. The alien must have been inspected and admitted or paroled, be eligible for an immigrant visa and admissible for permanent residence, and, with some exceptions, have maintained lawful nonimmigrant status. The alien must also not have engaged in unauthorized employment.
Section 245(i) of the Act allows an alien to apply to adjust status under section 245 notwithstanding the fact that he or she entered without inspection, overstayed, or worked without authorization.
LINK.

How Do I Benefit From Section 245(i)?

Our immigration laws allow qualified individuals to enter the United States as lawful permanent residents ("green card" holders) after they obtain immigrant visas from a consulate or embassy outside the United States or, for many immigrants already lawfully in the United States, through a process called "adjustment of status." If you entered the United States unlawfully, if you entered with permission but did not stay in lawful status, or if you worked without permission, you normally would have to leave the United States in order to apply for an immigrant visa. Special rules under section 245(i) may allow you to apply to adjust status without leaving the United States.

You might need section 245(i) if you:


LINK

"Indeed, during the immigration debate of 1984 we suggested an ultimate goal to guide passing policies--a constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders." - July 2, 2001 - ROBERT L. BARTLEY - Editor of The Wall Street Journal
"Another amnesty for undocumented aliens is already in the air"

George W. Bush In Firm Agreement With Communist Party:

Communist Party USA - Proposed Resolution against Racism and for Immigrant Rights

A] Open unlimited immigration into the USA - Jorge W. Bush - Open Borders

B] Compulsory bi-lingual education for all adults and their families of whatever country or cultural background. Federal prohibition of " English Only" - English, Huh? Bush firmly rejected “English-only,” which has caused problems among Hispanics. “I support English-plus, not English-only,” said Bush.
“English-only says to me that if Hispanic happens to be your heritage, you’re not part of the process.”

C] Extension of all existing labor and workplace protection laws, and the right to redress under them for all immigrant workers, documented or not. Bush measure to be introduced in Congress that grants Illegal Aliens the same rights in the workplace as U.S. citizens.

D] Support for the AFL-CIO policy on amnesty, and a call for a major AFL-CIO drive in all minority communities, and that consciously strategies to avoid any attempts to "whipsaw" one community against another. George W. Bush or Bill Clinton, take your pick.

In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt give strongest support yet to more open borders, immigration reform

"President of the United States Wants To Grant Amnesty Up To 4 Million Illegal Aliens"

George W. Bush: No Amnesty for Immigrants - "There's going to be no amnesty"
"READ MY LIPS"

George W. Bush Doesn't Need No Stinking Polls
NOTE: How George W. Bush Uses Polls

Jorge W. Bush Was Just Kidding - Bush Administration Wants to Extend Immigration "Amnesty"

"Bush Presiona Por La 245(i)"


202 posted on 03/23/2002 9:17:23 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Texasforever
The truth is, this is no agenda. Bush was boxed in by the rats using enron to do it. The only way out for Bush and there is only one. He vetos it and tells the people why. That is it. Anything less is worthless. Rush is right and Bush knows what he has to do this week. Veto it.

If he signs this bill as an old friend said to me, he is Finished and the conservatives will send him packing in 2004. Just like the republicans on the list that voted for it. Who I think need to be really freep but good.

203 posted on 03/23/2002 9:18:51 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson