Replies

First of all the DW being able to see into Danielle's bedroom crap.. I posted that. I got an e-mail from a friend who e-mailed someone she knows in SD. This person lives about 5 miles from SS and is married to someone in LE. The friend and I are polar opposites in this DW debate, although she will admit that the VD's are sleazy. I even tried to show my friend with maps, diagrams and photos and she know her source is RIGHT and NOTHING can change that upto and including facts. She's entitled to her opinion, even if she is a "soccer mom" (I mean that in clintonesque sort of way).

I know this thread was originally about sex offenders and pervs but look a some of the stuff in the non-tabloid, non-porn mags out there, it borders on porn and is extremely suggestive. I know men who have remarked upon the ads in these mags.

I think the neighbor, as well intentioned as she may be, is confused. "I noticed the blinds on that night but never looked before but I tell you it was then"... she suports that theory about birds of a feather... there shall be no blemish on suburbia or LE.

I think David is a target because of his success and that he's single. For Brenda's part, she would sell DW in a second, because if it was DvD, there's no guarantee she could get David other than for a quickie, He know what she IS. For DvD to hand him over, well it's just the competition. And besides if David's convicted, they can sue and they will win, even if he's not convicted they can still sue and win.

I don't see DW how he could have kidnapped and killed and dumped Danielle, in the time frame the police give since he had to use the RV. Maybe this is a smoke screen by SDPD, no it's just convenient. Fathers don't assault their children (yeah right), and single men with porn do. Brenda had to have know about the porn or suspected, it's just too easy. Even the DA knows that, and he's just trying keep the doubts lingering and they lynch mob stoked. As I've said often, no matter how distasteful you find porn, it does not a murderer make. Besides, if he was that in to it, there would be more recent porn and more than 1 interactive movie/cartoon. More people should understand this.

Okay, that's my 3 and one-half cents for this evening.

"Brenda had to have know about the porn or suspected, it's just too easy. "

That is certainly my suspicion too. IF they were in fact having an affair, they might have talked about a lot of things, maybe including what he found on his son's computer? One post on the SDU-T site actually stated that the zip disks were the son's--but I can't verify that on the web, so I relegate it to the "theory" pile. (Apparently, the U-T publishes more in the print version than they do on their website--I've seen maybe 6-7 articles referenced as being in the U-T that are NOT on the website. Ah, to have the paper version....)