Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skipjackcity; jaded; spectre; FresnoDA
Interestingly enough, at the PH, towards the end, Feldman said something about wanting to bring in testimony from alibi witnesses, but was not permitted to do so. Perhaps this trial is not a slam-dunk, after all? Does anyone else remember hearing this, or have a transcript handy?
109 posted on 03/24/2002 7:34:19 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: golitely
My evidence suggests that there was a list of persons whom Mr Feldman would have liked to call, but the judge said he would only allow them if

(1) They were definite alibi witnesses who could place DW elsewhere when crime committed; or

(2) some other category such as persons who would flatly contradict, falsify, and impugn what had already been said by Van Dams or other persons who DID testify...

Apparently the witnesses in question were not very clearly in those categories, and the judge quickly wrapped it up, before perhaps it could be determined whether the witnesses proposed would or would not, fit one of those two.

116 posted on 03/24/2002 8:45:40 AM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson