[Freedom2specul8]

Hi *J*

WRT: pierce, he stated in that article that he did not have the money..no credibility...IMHO. Yes, he said "he knows someone" who said they'd put the money up...so where is it? Who are they? I wonder if the people who discovered Danielle are going to see a dime of it. Maybe they didn't meet the stipulations, whatever they were. Frankly, I'm wondering if they'll actually accept the reward(s) offered anyway. I wouldn't..

I might have missed the report that said pages were ripped out of the diary.. That would be very strange indeed...where did you read that?

[MizSterious]

Just for the record, it will depend on how the reward offer was worded. If it said (as many do) "...for the safe return of Danielle" or words to that effect, the reward offerer would not be obligated to pay off. I believe the bail bondsman worded his offer like that. Anyone have a link to Pierce's reward offer?