Can I ask what your theory might be? Im willing to take ANY theory and weigh it, but I cant see any way Bush wont sign this. Him simply signing it shows he knowingly is not fallowing through on an oath....but Ill wait to see your theory. His theory is that he can outraise anyone in hard money, so it will not affect him. As can most republicans. Also it will be shot down in the courts, and no liberal journalist can attack him on it.
I'll give you MY theory if you will explain to me how you are POSITIVE that it's unconstitutional. It's not unconstitutional until it has been challenged in court, it cannot be challenged in court until it's a law, and it's not a law until he signs it.
So how is everybody so dang sure it's unconstitutional?
And do you think Bush should veto a bill that MIGHT be constitutional?