Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
Get back to your greasy machinery spaces, snipe! Warner isn't responsible for the security of a naval base, the commander of the base is! (at least ever since the 1834 edition of U.S. Naval Regulations were written).
141 posted on 03/22/2002 11:52:54 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: meandog
Get back to your greasy machinery spaces, snipe! Warner isn't responsible for the security of a naval base, the commander of the base is!

Warner is responsible for funding of such. Defense cuts under his tenure have lessened that ability as they are being like every other branch over deployed. I understand what you are saying. But Warner was in a position to say no to those cuts. The GOP is by no means innocent in it's co-support of defunding the military to a dangerous level. We had rent-a-cops at NOB 76-80 but the entrance gates and piers had U.S. Marines. Even Tidewater transit buses were checked for military ID's before entry. You did not approach D&S or the other piers in small craft. The base commander can not deploy or use people he does not have. As well the CVN's sitting their no longer have MARDET's either.

142 posted on 03/22/2002 12:05:13 PM PST by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson