I try to see what things MEAN, not how bad things are.
It would help me, anyway. Yes.
I didn't mean it as criticism. Just observation.
So tell us, Howlin.
What does it mean when numerous pathologists state that Ron Brown might have a bullet wound in his head and should have been autopsied?
What does it mean when the government can't come up with the name of a single pathologist who says otherwise?
What does it mean when the photos and x-rays that seem to support that possibility disappear from a locked safe at AFIP?
What does it mean when AFIP managers are caught lying about the evidence and the opinions of their staff (the pathologists and photographer)?
What does it mean when the Clinton government destroys the careers of fine pathologists (and the AFIP's top photographer) rather than just explain to them why they are mistaken about the wound in Brown's head and what the x-rays seem to show?
What does it mean when the military photographer in charge of photographing the Brown examination swears under oath that she was told by another military officer (Sentelle) that Gormley (the man who "examined" Brown's body) tampered with the x-rays to try and hide indications of a lead snowstorm (a bullet)?
What does it mean when Gormley admits that he was ordered not to do an autopsy by the Whitehouse, JCS and Commerce Department?
What does it mean when Gormley admits that he was mistaken about the facts that he said led him to state Brown died by blunt force trauma?
What does it mean when a government document is discovered that indicates there were two survivors instead of the one admitted to by the government?
What does it mean when we learn that an AWACS and the airport simultaneously lost contact with the plane when it was still 8 miles from the crash site?
What does it mean when we learn that a portable beacon (which some experts suggest could have been used to spoof the plane into flying into the ground exactly as it did) disappeared just a few days before the crash?
What does it mean when the person in charge of that beacon is found dead with a shotgun blast to the chest just days after the crash and before he can be interviewed by investigators?
What does it mean when this was the first crash in Air Force history (other than a friendly fire mistake in Iraq) where the Air Force canceled the Safety Board portion of the investigation (the portion SPECIFICALLY charged with "finding the cause")?
What does it mean when we have sworn testimony that Brown told Clinton he was going to turn state's evidence in Chinagate and DNC campaign finance illegalities just days before his death occurred?
What does it mean when given all of the above facts, Ashcroft has not even investigated what really happened? For that matter, what does it mean when Ashcroft doesn't investigate ANY of the Clinton/DNC crimes?
What does it mean when you said you believe Brown was not murdered but wouldn't tell us why?
What does it mean when after much urging you finally cited Starr as your reason, even though Starr was not involved in the Brown case?
What does it mean when, after even further urging, you cited the "official" report I mentioned above as your reason, even though it contains Gormley's "mistaken" conclusion and fails to mention ANY of the incriminating facts listed above.
Finally, what does it mean when you say that those of us who don't believe Brown or Vince Foster died as the Clinton administration claimed give the GOP a bad name?
What does it MEAN?