Sure we can. We do it all the time.
How would you know, sinkspur? You yourself wrote on another thread I have never argued the facts of the Ron Brown case because I don't know the facts of the Ron Brown case. What's more, I dont' care about Ron Brown. He's dead. You also wrote that I don't come on the Ron Brown threads. In fact, I've NEVER been on a Ron Brown thread.
And your arguments on the Brown topic during the few "discussions" you and I have had can be sumed up by the following quotes by you:
The absolute worst thing a Bush administration could do is to go back and drag these Ruddy-led conspiracies out of mothballs.
You're obsessed with Ron Brown.
Any time the Republicans have pursued CLinton, THEY have suffered, not Clinton.
You'd be better off arguing the JFK assassination again.
Was Vince Foster murdered? Did the Navy shoot down TWA800? Did the US government blow up the Murrah building in OKC? Did John Danforth cover-up for the government on Waco?
In other words, there wasn't one instance where you actually argued the facts in the case. NOT ONE. All you did was resort to the same debating tactics that democRATS use ... adhominem attack, disinformation, smear, distraction, "move-on" ...
And guess what ... those are exactly the same tactics every other "move-on"er has used when I raised the Brown specter. I dare you to prove me wrong. Cite the URL of a discussion I have had on Brown where one of you "move-on"ers has actually debated the facts in the Brown case. You MIGHT find one or two where someone selectively argued one or two facts out of the DOZENS (and ALWAYS lost). I could easily list DOZENS of threads where move-on'ers have run from the facts. In fact, here's one, showing you doing just that ... http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3aa3e65a3857.htm.
Get a life, BAC. Nobody cares.