Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KansasGirl
Why is Ashcroft going to defend this piece of crap legislation anyway? I don't get it.

During the nomination hearings, the Demoncrats put Ashcroft's nuts in a vice and made him promise to defend and enforce Federal laws. Senate Rats were worried Ashcroft would renege on enforcing laws he didnt like (namely cr*p like using RICO against prolife groups, Aff. Action etc.) ... so, Ashcroft has and will be defending some silly stuff. hopefully USSC will see past it.

BTW, Starr is a great choice as lead plaintiff on this. He will fare far better than he did on Whitewater. Only better choice is Ted Olsen and he is busy. :-)

174 posted on 03/21/2002 5:13:11 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
"During the nomination hearings, the Demoncrats put Ashcroft's nuts in a vice and made him promise to defend and enforce Federal laws. Senate Rats were worried Ashcroft would renege on enforcing laws he didnt like (namely cr*p like using RICO against prolife groups, Aff. Action etc.) ... so, Ashcroft has and will be defending some silly stuff. hopefully USSC will see past it."

So? So what. Bush promised to veto the bill, and he's gonna sign it. So, now that we've established the worth of a promise, I see no obligation for Ashcroft to run with this abortion.

245 posted on 03/21/2002 8:44:01 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson