Skip to comments.
Kenneth Starr to lead legal team challenging campaign finance legislation
Associated Press ^
| 3-21-02
| JIM ABRAMS
Posted on 03/21/2002 1:29:30 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (AP) --
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; cfr; cfrlist; kennethstarr; kenstarr; silenceamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-348 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh come on you guys. Ken Starr was a lousy prosecutor, but face it, he was (and continues to be) a first rate Constitutional lawyer. He has an excellent reputation with the USSC, and he knows that this is a prime opportunity to regain his reputation.
There is a BIG difference between trying to prosecute the scumbag (which Starr had exactly zero experience with) and arguing a case before the Supreme Court (which Starr has extensive experience with).
To: ex-Texan
I agree. I really think it is a bad move!! Why is Ashcroft going to defend this piece of crap legislation anyway? I don't get it.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ouch.
23
posted on
03/21/2002 1:45:47 PM PST
by
diotima
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Starr ought to resign and appoint Kathleen Sullivan, Dean of the Stanford University Law School, as the Chief Legal Counsel.
She has major credibility.
Starr is a 'goofy-guss' tainted with sex in my humble opinion.
24
posted on
03/21/2002 1:46:40 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: Oldeconomybuyer
ROFLOL!!! Why don't the Pubbies just take out an ad in the Liberal Media and announce the fact they think their constituents have a collective IQ of 6.5?
25
posted on
03/21/2002 1:47:15 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Again can I say--------the Two-Party Cartel--------------
26
posted on
03/21/2002 1:47:31 PM PST
by
Digger
To: diotima
The Republicans are so damned stupid that I don't want to be one anymore.
Where shall I go?
Go Pat Go?
or
Go Pot Go?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Mabey we can get Newt too.
To: ALL;Iron Eagle;
Just a moment folks. This is actually Starr's area of expertise if I recall his background correctly.
He was a poor proscecutor, no question about that.
This is a different kind of lawyering in which he has demonstrated prowess.
I think when some Freeper attorneys weigh in, they may agree with me.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh G-d. We lost already.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
GW ala his father when he did NOT get the permission & therefor never went to Bagdad, plus his no new taxes & do not forget ADA. Now this one with his immigration & this abomination of no veto will go the same way.
31
posted on
03/21/2002 1:50:44 PM PST
by
Digger
To: KansasGirl
The usual method of things is for the admin to defend bills against those who seek to attack them, even if they personally dislike them.
To: deport
I bet Klayman files a suit to keep Starr off this case.
33
posted on
03/21/2002 1:52:28 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Seeking the truth
I agree. Bill Clinton made it about "sex", not Ken Starr. I wish some of these people would settle down and THINK.
34
posted on
03/21/2002 1:52:29 PM PST
by
DJ88
To: Nunya Bidness
Bush said the bill is "flawed," but promised to sign it because he said it improves the system overall. This is your brain on Pragmatism.
35
posted on
03/21/2002 1:52:33 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: chookter
He is going to be arguing the case in the Supreme Court, not the media. This is not necessarily a mistake.
To: Askel5
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
To: Howlin
LOL!!!! ;-)
38
posted on
03/21/2002 1:53:12 PM PST
by
DJ88
To: Askel5
All I can figure is that McConnell is signalling that if W doesn't grow some 'nads and veto this abomination that Mitch will turn it into a circus and destroy the Republican party. That's all I can tell....
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh good grief. If he handles this like Whitewater, he'll spend six years putting his case together and end up working on an immigration act.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-348 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson