There are two ways to investigate something, including Al Hussain Hussaini and the John Doe2 issue:
Our preconceived notions are all different. Why clutter up the topic and alienate people along the way?
Can somebody post the Hussaini picture next to the John Doe 2 sketch?
I knew where you where coming from, Nitz, I just wanted to bring this thread back on topic. I wish NDCORUP was still with us.
Nita, I don't know that you recall this detail, but Wallaby can address it from his recollection: I had been HARPING on the detail that we needed to know WHO was in charge of Security for the Murrah Bldg. I could find NO references to it.
That had not been covered. Wallaby, whether because of my repetition or not, dug out an article that mentioned TEG. When I tried to find anything on them I'd draw a blank. Wallaby kept digging and found more that related to AKAL. It went from there.
Now with regard to mentioning NWO stuff, I'll not stop that for my part. Simply because, to me, that it is the logic behind the majority of what is occuring and accellerating. If folks don't want to hear it, fine. Recall your experience with quidam, it reached no conclusion. Did it?
What I'm saying is that planting the seeds of a logical answer to strange, and by individual review of details, un-connected major events is to me a method that has worked in the past. It may get some of us labeled KooKs, but I, speaking for myself, do not care.
I'm not a missionary, nor a crusader that MUST succeed. I'll just put my thoughts and opinions out there, and if others dismiss them, so be it. We're in a very fast countdown now.
I'm sorry you feel some of us are using the wrong methods, but that's the way it'll be. O.K.