Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
Please see my post 48. Then read ALL of my previous posts on this thread. Then stop "spinning" my words. Then define "Bush's people". Keep in mind you know very little about me personally.

Then come back and explain away his statement yesterday publicly acknowledging that he will sign what he defines as an unconstitutional bill.

61 posted on 03/21/2002 8:38:33 AM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
"An issue that has no resonance in the polls. What's the point?"

Prime Example.

Who Validates the Polls?

70 posted on 03/21/2002 8:46:08 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
Look, believe what you want to believe.

Don't vote for Bush the next time around.

Just stop the whining.

You aren't inclined to delve into the finer of this legislation. In that regard, you are politically naive. You want the President to veto this legislation strictly on constitutional grounds, even if it causes his opposition to have the upper hand and be able to relentlessly attack him with for the next 3-4 weeks, or even months. May be even hold it over his head this November, during Congressional elections. I'd try thinking for a change and stop being so rigid with your political ideology.

I already said, I wouldn't sign it, but I'm not an absolutist either. You can't just draw a line in the sand, on each and every issue. Pragmatism and compromise will get you most of what you want, but not everything you want.

81 posted on 03/21/2002 8:55:58 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson