Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
It is Bush's responsibility to veto any bill that is unconstitutional. Passing it off to the Supreme Court is not upholding his duty as President.

Short of the President having an epiphany, or turning an immediate about face, the deed is done! This constant whining about it solves nothing and serves no good purpose. As was pointed out in the link I supplied, Texasforever clearly points out and defines the areas of this CFR legislation that met the outline of what President Bush was looking for. I wouldn't sign it, myself and I believe the President is playing politics on this issue, but so what! It does no good for Bush to give the loyal opposition and the liberal media additional political ammunition to fire back at the President, at will.

The right way to handle any campaign finance reform, would be to allow unlimited contributions, with full and immediate disclosure. Not many people would agree with such drastic changes in campaign finance law. Even fewer Congressmen would agree to imposing it. But it's the right decision to make.

32 posted on 03/21/2002 8:07:07 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
You don't seem to hear me. I don't care about CFR or the political game he's playing. I really don't. I do care that a President would make a public statement that he is willing to sign something unconstitutional. I care even more that he intends to actually do it.
35 posted on 03/21/2002 8:11:53 AM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson