Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Federal prosecutors said they could have made a case in court that "Mrs. Clinton had the billing records" and thus obstructed justice, but concluded "the evidence was insufficient to satisfy a jury beyond a reasonable doubt."

Since this was never presentd to a jury we'll never know for sure.

1 posted on 03/20/2002 11:38:48 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
I thought that she was The Most Brilliant Woman in the World?How could she forget ANYTHING???Oh,that's right!Mr.and Mrs"BeelzeBubba's" Brilliant Minds only falter when they are Under Oath!!!!!!!!!!!
2 posted on 03/21/2002 5:17:29 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *ClintonScandals;*Clinton Haters
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
3 posted on 03/21/2002 8:25:41 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
And they all skip. Anybody surprised?
5 posted on 06/03/2002 11:25:05 AM PDT by babylonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The workers saw her carrying documents. On cross-examination, they would be forced to admit that they had no idea what those documents were.

If that doesn't fit a description of "reasonable doubt" in your mind, please do not ever sit on a jury.

7 posted on 06/03/2002 11:42:17 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson