I know what you mean, I am an old fart too and deeply resent presidents younger than I am. LOL
I guess that makes 3 of us. Even after 9 years it seems wrong to be older than the President. In any case, maybe that's why the three of us are still up in the middle of the night, with nothing better to do.
This may not be the kind of thing you were asking about, and is definately not what Dornan was talking about, because he was arguing that congress could pass legislation outlawing abortion and make it not subject to Judicial Review. But a quick google search turns up plenty of things that are not subject to Judicial Review. thhis is just the first one I came to. Social Security Stuff.DETERMINATIONS; APPEALS [442] SEC. 1869. [42 U.S.C. 1395ff] (a) The determination of whether an individual is entitled to benefits under part A or part B, and the .....
(A) Such a determination shall not be reviewed by any administrative law judge..........
(4) A regulation or instruction which relates to a method for determining the amount of payment under part B and which was initially issued before January 1, 1981, shall not be subject to judicial review.
(5) In an administrative hearing pursuant to paragraph (1), where the moving party alleges that there are no material issues of fact in dispute, the administrative law judge shall make an expedited determination as to whether any such facts are in dispute and, if not, shall determine the case expeditiously.