No and you could not before this law either. What you can do is contribute twice as much now. Don't play games exodus you are not prepared. I don't mind arguing the constitutional basis because I would tend to agree it is dubious BUT this bill is better than the CF laws we did have.
Wanna bet some REAL_MONEY?
To: exodus
No and you could not before this law either. What you can do is contribute twice as much now. Don't play games exodus you are not prepared. I don't mind arguing the constitutional basis because I would tend to agree it is dubious BUT this bill is better than the CF laws we did have.
# 569 by Texasforever
****************************
That's my point, Texasforever. Both before and after this bill, government infringes on our freedom.
No joke, I'm glad to hear you say that you agree that restrictions on spending are un-Constitutional.
You're right, I haven't read the bill. I don't always have time to research everything before I post. However, no matter what the bill "allows," it doesn't remove all restrictions on a citizen's ability to participate in elections.
I know that the restrictions are there to "protect" us from those mean ol' special interests, but I would rather brave that danger than have my government restrict MY power to act on my own. I shouldn't have to say "pretty please" before I speak. I don't NEED permission. I have the right to be heard.