It's too bad Bush can't submit it for review BEFORE signing it. That way, when the USSC rules on the free speech clauses, Bush can veto it, say he is doing so because of the oath he took, and send it back so they can strike the clause(s) from the bill and send it back to him to sign.
After all, if it's a Constitutional issue, wouldn't he want to have that in writing from the final arbiter of the Constitution BEFORE signing it? Or am I being to idealistic?
to=too (god, I hate it when other people do that, and I just did it).