[Buckeroo]

You have allowed yourself to be trapped in the mystery of unconstitutional government operations that oppose the creation methods of the same. You agree with mere law; you regard the Constitution as a corrupt method of controlling the law. Your advocacy is the reason why we have Bush ready to sign into law methods to usurp the Constitution.

[jwalsh07]

You're a damned fool if you think the section of the constitution requiring Congress to appropriate funds every two years to fund our standing Armies prevents us from fighting wars.

A big damned fool.

[concerned about politics]

Your advocacy is the reason why we have Bush ready to sign into law methods to usurp the Constitution.

But you libertarians don't vote Republican anyway. What does your opinion of Bush matter? You didn't vote for Bush in the first place! Of course you'd be Bush bashers, no matter what he does.

[DJ88]

Listen. If Bush vetoed this law, it could and would very well come up again. If he signs it, then sends it to SCOTUS (as he has said in his own press release that parts of it are unconstitutional), SCOTUS could rule on it and render the decision that it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL and it would never be brought up again...ever. Unless someone wants to make an amendment to the Constitution, and that would never pass, I have to say that although my first reaction was HORROR..I think he may have found a way to make sure the Constitution will never be used as toilet paper again.