You're essentially claiming that what you do on your own property cannot possibly effect my property rights. However, by your formulation, my exercise of property rights includes the right to do with my property as I will, include selling it. The question then is, in that situation can your exercise of property rights possibly have an impact on me?
Putting it that way, yours is clearly a false premise: the condition of your property can indeed affect my ability to dispose of my property as I see fit. The condition of your property enhances or degrades the market value of my own, and makes my property more or less saleable.
In that case, your actions on your property obviously can affect my property rights, in the sense that they affect my ability to dispose of it as I will. IOW, your property rights and mine are not independent.
Things like that are the basis of the valid concept of "community interest," which can and should act as a constraint on the unlimited exercise of property rights.
No, it only affects the dollar value. You can still dispose of your property (nobody has taken that from you) but probably not for what you think it is worth.
In a free market capitalist society what you are free to do is:
If you think your neighbor is driving the price of your property down, you simply buy his property and then you can do with it as you see fit. Otherwise, you have no right to impose your will on him for your benefit.
This is incorrect. The value of any good on the market is exactly what the buyer is willing to pay. Value is completely and utterly subjective. Some people will refuse to buy a beautifully kept-up house in a safe neighborhood because their prospective neighbor owns several large dogs or has a number of young children. Are the neighbors violating your property rights by having a family? In no way.
Your property rights are an objective fact: no one may intrude on your property or take it from you by either force or fraud without violating your rights. This is objectively ascertainable: is someone on your property without your permission?
Value is entirely subjective - is the neighbor's house too pink? Have too many children in it? Have too many cheesy lawn ornaments? Have an extremely ugly car parked in its driveway? There are far too many variables to judge. No one can draw a definitive line as to what constitutes the erosion of property value in the mind of each and every prospective buyer.
But you can draw a physical line between where your property ends and another's begins. If your house is worth $25,000 or $250,000 it's still your house.
If my property makes yours less valuable, do you get to sue me for the difference when you sell?
The answer is NO to both questions, as you very well know. If I have no right to the benefit you receive from the good condition of my property, what makes you think you have the right to force me to improve the value of your land? It's called theft, and conversion of my property rights to your benefit, you communist. Worse, it's done by the State, at your behest, on penalty of DEATH if I resist.
I mourn the old man in this case, but I'm glad he took one of the thieving communist bastards with him.
Seems to me that you are only interested in the "disposal value of your property" and nothing else in your so-called community spirit. LOL