Replies

FREE TED MAHER NOW, MONACO

DAY 1,047 WRONGLY IMPRISONED WITHOUT TRIAL ON EXTORTED FALSE CONFESSION

The prosecutor is a liar. Case dismissed.

Monaco prosecutor Daniel Serdet is a liar.

Serdet told Time.com's Thomas Sancton that Ted was on drugs.

Monaco's Princess Grace Memorial Hospital tested Ted for drugs and alcohol.

The results were negatif negatif negatif.

This was shown on national television November 21, 2000 on DatelineNBC "Who Killed the Billionaire?"

So we must treat Monaco prosecutor Daniel Serdet as Charles Laughton treated his witness in "Witness for the Prosecution":

In the movie "Witness for the Prosecution," Charles Laughton asks,

"The question is, were you lying then, are you lying now, or are you not, in fact, a chronic and habitual liar?"

Serdet's witnesses are all like that:

Lily paid off her nursing supervisor Sonia Casiano Herkrath with a $100,000 "confidentiality agreement"--

Sonia's three contradictory fire report depositions are the only evidence of the final moments of Edmond and Vivian.

Why should we believe the paid agent of the lucky widow when each report is different?

And to this day Sonia is still changing and adding details--

Now she says she told them to open a window!

The fire report states repeatedly that firemen were unable to break the category three bulletproof glass (four layers totalling over an inch in thickness).

Why didn't she say so in any of her three fire report depositions?

Were the police holding you in four-point restraint, catheterized and threatening your spouse and children?

We'll see Griffith at the trial as he's the only lawyer Ted's acknowledging.

And we can ask Serdet:

Were you lying then, are you lying now, or are you not, in fact, a chronic and habitual liar?

MONACO'S WITNESSES FOR THE PROSECUTION--PAID ACTORS AND ACTRESSES--PAID BY WHOM?