[HamiltonJay]

, doubts and suspicion overwhelm the "evidence"

Sorry, don't think so, there is a huge difference between "reasonable" doubt and no doubt. Danieles blood in RV and on his clothes, scratches on his arms, etc etc... or the 6 people locked in the garage, planted the evidence on the neighbor. Sorry guys, I see nothing that makes me believe the cops have the wrong man, and all this conspiracy theory sounds like the drivel of a desperate defense attorney.

[fivecatsandadog]

there is a huge difference between "reasonable" doubt and no doubt. Danieles blood in RV and on his clothes, scratches on his arms, etc etc...

Last I read, the DNA was inconclusive. An MitDNA was done and confirmed that the blood was EITHER Danielle's OR her mother's. I believe that the all-conclusive DNA test, whatever that is called, has yet to be complete with results. Scratches on his arm? Who knows? He was stuck in the desert, could have been caught on some brush. Point is, NO ONE saw how he got scratched. This forum is here to express opinions and debate both sides of the issue. Your posts come across as very one-sided and belligerant, BTW.

[fivecatsandadog]

and I might add, I doubt that DW is a victim of some frame-up by the cops or local politics. UNTIL the evidence proves beyond a REASONABLE doubt (ok?) that DW did it, yada, yada -