[RnMomof7]

Really? It looks like the Clintons are doing just fine, and they've fueled and worn out so many rumor mills that the rumor industry has never had it so good. And guess what? So far, as far as I know (I might have missed some), every single one of those "rumors" turned out to be true. Blue dresses, rapes, assaults, criminal enterprise. No, I look at rumors, and consider them at least worth investigating. If we had dismissed the Clinton rumors, what a bunch of dufuses we'd have been--Free Republic would be little better than the Democratic Underground. Blind sheep, instead of following the money and other trails.

PING

Those complaining are the libertarian side of the FR coin..don't much like light in dark corners:>)

[Freedom2specul8]

I am not going to deny, that I have BOTH libertarian and conservative tendencies. (the clinton-impeachment hearings caused that...had the repubs been more tougher..things would be different for them today) It's evolved over the past few years. If the cards lay out..and the evidence shows the police set up dw like oj (ha ha, I couldn't resist)..fine, I'll live wiht it. OR if the evidence was planted by the parents, (though it's being assumed he did not wear the blood stained jacked that weekend)--we'll know soon enough I suppose. As far as having the light of truth shown in dark corners, that's all we've asked for. *rumors aren't the light*, I would consider them more of "talk of a lightswitch".. LOL

[fnord]

Those complaining are the libertarian side of the FR coin..don't much like light in dark corners:>)

Completely, dead wrong on both points. See what happens when you try to fit a one-dimensional definition into a 3-dimensional world?