Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feldman's Questions Show Defense Strategy: Dig into Damon and Brenda van Dam's Private Lives!
KNSD NBC ^ | March 19, 2002 | Lynn Stuart

Posted on 03/19/2002 2:33:12 PM PST by FresnoDA

Experts say attorney Steven Feldman's questioning of the van Dams gives clues to the strategy he will pursue during the trial.
 
Feldman's questions show defense strategy
 
 
by Lynn Stuart
 
SAN DIEGO, March 15 –    When the parents of Danielle van Dam testified Thursday at a hearing to decide if the murder case should go to trial, it gave the suspect's attorney, Steven Feldman, an opportunity to grill them.

Much of the questioning may have seemed like needless digging into the couple's private lives, but experts say Feldman was laying groundwork for his defense.

 

At times during the long day of questioning, Brenda and Damon van Dam appeared openly exasperated by the tough questioning dished out by Feldman. The attorney for murder defendant David Westerfield focused on the couple's drug use, their alleged "swinging lifestyle," and lies they told to police early in the investigation into Danielle van Dam's disappearance. Many of his questions were ruled irrelevant, and at times it appeared to the untrained observer that the attorney was asking the same questions over and over as he tried to find a wording that satisfied the judge. But legal experts gave Feldman's savvy courtroom performance high marks.

"It may just look like not much was happening, but Steve Feldman really got in there, he did his homework and he got the answers to the questions he needed to get," criminal defense lawyer Gretchen von Helms said.

Some of the questioning was an attempt to catch the van Dams in inconsistencies. If Feldman can show that Brenda or Damon answered Thursday in ways that contradict or were inconsistent with their past statements or the testimony of others, it could hurt the prosecution's case when it goes before the future jury.

One example is when Feldman questioned Brenda about her night out at Dad's Cafe.

"You just told me you don't recall dancing with David Westerfield. Is that true?" Feldman asked.

"Yes," Brenda answered.

Feldman claims that he has witnesses who will testify that they saw Brenda dancing with Westerfield the night before Danielle was discovered missing. That could raise doubts about the mother among jurors, legal observers said.

"He wasn't asking those questions for anything but preparing a transcript so that he can use that for impeaching those witnesses at trial and he did that very effectively.," von Helms said. Feldman peppered both parents with questions about their drug use.

"How often did you smoke marijuana?' he asked.

During the preliminary hearing, the judge ruled that many of Feldman's questions about the van Dams' lifestyle were irrelevant. But during the trial, the defense will be permitted more latitude, and von Helms expects Feldman to bring up the subject again.

"It opens up to the defense to go in an say not only were they doing drugs and having sex and all these other things, which in one side of it, but also that it affected their ability to be parents," von Helms said.

The questioning also gave Feldman a chance to see how the van Dam's react to his questions. How the van Dams appear to a jury could plant seeds of doubt that affect their deliberations on Westerfield's guilt. Legal experts say if the parent's don't show any more emotion in trial than they did in court today, that factor alone could hurt them with a jury.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 821-837 next last
To: rolling_stone
True....mentally culpable
581 posted on 03/21/2002 10:56:59 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~;golitely;spectre;Jaded

In a sense of "fairness" to those on the thread who oppose the "allegations" and "speculation" surrounding the Rick Roberts posting of the anonymous Law Enforcement officer, I offer up this equally fantastic "speculative scenario" posted on the Websleuths Site.

It is enact as posted, except for the deletion of "questionable language" which might be offensive and in violation of FR posting guidelines.

FresnoDA


HOW WESTERFIELD KIDNAPPED DANIELLE VAN DAM (The Theory!)

LAST EDITED ON Mar-21-02 AT 01:59 PM (EST)

I am posting a possible scenario, with the following caveat: unless forensic evidence can be verified that puts DW in the VD home on 2/1/2002, IMO reasonable doubt exists as to his guilt- given facts we have as of this time. The following is JMO and should not construed as fact, unless it is something brought out in prelim. Because Danielle’s brutal murder is incomprehensible to me, some out of reality humor appears to help deflect the anguish. OK.

11:15 – 11:30 PM: With Gary, DW leaves Dads in a heightened state of angered arousal given the dirty dancing and his inability to connect with babs or BVD, not to mention how babs and BVD were “making fun” of DW with snide remarks within his earshot.

After leaving Gary DW is doing a “slow burn” and drives by VD house a couple of times. He sees one car in the drive, must be the sitter's car. DW is sure DVD is away on business. DW thought he overheard BVD say a sitter was with her kids. DW goes home, turns on his computer, and pours himself a stiff one, then another and another. While watching the arousing images on his computer, his sexual energy and anger fester.

DW is going to “make something happen” over at the VDs to humiliate, embarrass or otherwise get BVD “in deep dodo”. “Maybe someone should scare the sitter chitless by appearing in the FR window with a nylon stocking on his head. DW is hell bent on conjuring up a way to bring BVD to her knees; DW hates women like BVD, always trying to control everything- and won’t share “the Club Roster”.

DW retrieves 2 syringes from a secret cabinet and inserts liquid date rape drug. From the attic, DW pulls down a brand new nylon sleeping bag, the kind that zips up tight. DW wants the sitter to be warm and safe after he snatches her and leaves her in the vacant house/yard next to VDs. OK, got the nylon stocking for his head, got the latex gloves and DW can feel the high of danger-risk.

1:30 AM: DW turns on his backyard floodlight—it will help illuminate the yard in the vacant house and serves to deflect the prying eyes of nosy neighbor Kravitz. Now filled with the bravado of lethal intoxication, DW stealthily moves toward the VD house. He can see the side garage door is open-what luck. Through glassy eyes, DW sees DVD’s van as he enters the garage. Congratulating himself for having the inside dope about DVD's business trip, DW is stopped in his size 12 shoes. “Holy cow! What is that.”? DW hears DVD’s soft, almost inaudible voice as he opens a sliding door and barks at the dog to hurry up and pee. DW always suspected Layla was a wimp. “Oh Bother!” If DVD is home, how can DW scare the sitter chitless.

1:54 AM: As DW struggles to process the deviation to his plan, two cars roar up and park. The group known as “The Pizza Party People” slosh out of the cars. BVD is the designated driver and, as such, timed her 4 vodkas and cranberry juice so that the jigger of tequila she knocked back would leave her clear headed. BVD understands that the designated driver never lets the high derived from La Cigar de Acapulco Gold interfere with being a clearly headed driver.

Like BVD, DW has remained clearly headed and ponders GET ME OUT OF HERE. Cleverly, DW goes out the gate and sneaks into the vacant house yard. The PPP gets louder and the sliding glass door is opened. DW blushes in purple as he hears the PPP ridiculing DW and making fun of how he dances. DW tries to clear his head; it isn’t working. DW is sweating profusely, even in the night air. DW thinks he should take the nylon stocking off his head. But wait-

2:15-2:20 AM: Suddenly the PPP minus BVD are leaving and Babs is chattering about how cute DVD looks in his boxer shorts. So as not to reveal his presence, DW hides behind the “Club” poster that BVD placed in the vacant neighbor’s yard—kind of a Welcome Wagon of sorts.

2:30 AM: DW hears loud arguing coming from the master bedroom. DW pretty much knows the layout of the house. Many times as he drove up and down the street, DW has enjoyed the sight of Danielle in her upstairs bedroom. She likes to make funny faces in her mirror; she dances about, seems very athletic. DW is high with the excitement of risk. Not easy being DW- getting to be an almost 50-year-old male.

2:40-3AM: The VDs are still yelling; DW mostly hears BVD, she is so controlling. Partly because he is getting cold in the vacant house yard and partly because the high from risk taking is euphorically intoxicating, DW makes a fateful decision.

With rolled up sleeping bag in hand, unzipped so he can easily put Danielle inside, DW is ready to roll. Face concealed by nylon stocking and armed with a tiny tool bag for his date rape syringes, which ironically is decorated with pink poodles, DW slithers through the sliding glass door.

Through the haze engulfing his dizzy head, DW feels empowered by his luck at having the door open for him. Hearing the ongoing hollering and possible beginning of sexual activity emanating from the master bedroom, DW noiselessly takes two stairs at a time and instantly identifies Danielle’s door- it has those purple and pink things on it.

Silently opening the door, DW moves to Danielle and punctures her arm with the needle. Danielle starts to cry out, but DW puts his hand over her mouth. As Danielle goes into a slumber, DW notices her mouth is bleeding from his hand. As DW puts Danielle in the waiting sleeping bag on the floor, his jacket contacts Danielle bloody mouth.

Quickly, DW zips up Danielle and lifts the sleeping bag. DW’s hand slips on the knob and he takes off the latex glove to open the door.

While the loud sexual activity is continuing, DW makes his way down the steps and out the sliding glass door. DW is a little dizzy, partly from carrying Danielle in the sleeping bag and partly in response to the buzz of sexual energy he is feeling. DW puts Danielle down and drags her a short distance while he opens the gate.
Taking long strides, DW’s 6’2” frame makes it back to his house in seconds. Into his garage with his treasure. DW is almost beside himself. “Wait till BVD finds out her precious baby isn’t in her bed.”

DW puts Danielle in his SUV, goes upstairs and gets a comforter and puts it on top of Danielle, who is now snuggly slumbering. Unbeknownst to DW, Danielle tiny body is struggling to withstand the impact of the powerful date rape drug flowing freely through her body.

3:20AM or so: DW decides to take Danielle to his RV. It would be good for her to “sleep it off” DW has abandoned #1 Rule: have a plan and follow it. DW doesn’t have a plan for how Danielle will be found.

Now in the RV, DW puts Danielle on the RV’s queen size bed. DW unzips the sleeping bag and is jolted by overpowering sexual urges. Danielle tries to scream, but can’t. Danielle struggles to get away and tries to pull herself up, grabbing the nearest thing- a cabinet beside the bed.

DW injects Danielle again, this time in an artery. She falls back, never to awake again. DW is oblivious to the lethal nature of the injection. DW dozes off for a period of time as yet undetermined by the keeper of the timeline. Awakening with an alarming jolt, as though park rangers were peaking in the window, DW sees that Danielle’s lips appear to be turning blue. He touches Danielle; she seems cold; not breathing;

PANIC: DW grabs Danielle drops her in the RV bathtub and turns on the shower in a frantic, futile effort to revive her. 2 tiny droplets of Danielle’s blood forever mark the carpet and give silent witness to the horror of this night.

DW is instantly sober; his mental gears shift full throttle into automatic self-preservation. What to do! What to do! DW zips Danielle naked, lifeless body into the sleeping bag and goes to his SUV.

GO, JUST GO his mind is telling him. He drives and drives and winds up on a windy country road, Dehesa Rd. Driving up a dirt road, DW drags the body to a place under a tree and obscured from the road. DW places the sleeping bag in a large trash bag and leaves. Stay tuned for The Longest Journey.


End post......FDA

582 posted on 03/21/2002 10:57:54 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty, rolling_stone
(a) Military detainer (see sample detainer at Figure 630.1 of this part) must be placed when a soldier is being held by civilian authorities and release of the soldier is not imminent. The installation commander or provost marshal may initiate a detainer. The purposes for filing a detainer are to--

(c) If an AWOL or DFR individual is being detained by civilian authorities the military police
(1) Notify the proper installation commander or coordination authority at once that the individual--
(i) Is being detained by civilian authorities on civil or criminal charges.

583 posted on 03/21/2002 11:00:46 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Case closed.
584 posted on 03/21/2002 11:02:34 AM PST by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
This doesn't sound so farfetched but we'll see.
585 posted on 03/21/2002 11:02:47 AM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Again, your excuses are going beyond "REASONABLE DOUBT" I do not find your version of events reasonable, or likely. But just to humor you, lets say I give you a pass on the blood and fingerprint in the RV.. how do you explain the blood on his jacket? All I see is people spinning like Carville.. you think a 7 year old climbed through the bushes and entered an open RV, as opposed to just walking around the bushes... Sorry, the cops arrested the right guy, and he is being tried. If he is innocent, so be it, but the theories being put forward here about his innocence thus far are more smoke and mirrors than a fiscal conservative democrat.
586 posted on 03/21/2002 11:02:53 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty, rolling_stone
(b) A reward can be paid to an eligible person or agency who apprehends and detains an absentee or deserter until military authorities assume control.

reward..wonder how much..

587 posted on 03/21/2002 11:03:04 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty, rolling_stone
Figure 630.1 of Part 630--Sample Military Detainer

I, (name of civilian representative) an official agent representing (name and address of civilian jurisdiction), accept custody and control of (grade, name, social security number), a U.S. Soldier, for trail on a charge (state offense(s)), I agree, on behalf of the jurisdiction named above, to inform the Commander, (installation address), of results of the judicial process and to return the solider at no expense to the Army or the soldier to said Army installation unless a place nearer the civilian jurisdiction is designed by Department of the Army. The soldier will be returned immediately on dismissal or other disposition of charges facilitating return of the soldier. When disposition precludes immediate return of the soldier following litigation, I will furnish results of the judicial process and information concerning the earliest possible date the soldier might be returned to Army control. I will also advise the designated commander whenever the location of incarceration of the soldier changes or whether soldier is released on bail or bond. I understand the above commander will advise the civilian jurisdiction which I represent if the soldier's return to military custody is no longer desired. I was furnished a copy of this agreement on (date).

(signature)
(position)
(name of jurisdiction)
(Address of jurisdiction)

588 posted on 03/21/2002 11:04:00 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
you haven't been following this case
you don't read the posts in this thread
you don't answer questions directed at you
you think Bill Clinton is smart! lol
you have this fixation with sex and democrats
you think we should listen to you??, lol
HJ,YATLW ... BB
589 posted on 03/21/2002 11:08:54 AM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
KFMB Evidence

pertinent part Unfortunately for Westerfield, he is going to have to figure out just how Danielle could have gained access to his motorhome. Further complicating the situation is how did she come to spill her blood in his motorhome?

We will have to wait and see. Brenda Van Dam may have given some help to the defense when she said she never danced with Westerfield at Dad's Bar. Apparently witnesses saw them dancing together. She had previously said that there was minimal contact between her and Westerfield. He had never been in her house.

If it is proven that she wasn't telling the truth about dancing with him is she hiding a more significant relationship? And if she is then maybe Danielle has had more contact with the Westerfield motor home than Brenda Van Dam claims.

We will have to wait until the investigation unfolds more to see!

All I am asking for is to wait and see just like here, as for blood on jacket, the minute spot was on right side near shoulder and could have gotten there from any number of ways especially wiping nose on jacket or such..the totality of circumstances will convict or aquit, I am still not buying his story about the wallet but am waiting for real testimony of Park Ranger to judge credibility...don't forget the "rumor" neighbors gardner saw BVD in the MH on several occasions...which if true could go a long way to explaining things in a totally different light...

590 posted on 03/21/2002 11:17:07 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I stand corrected, I think.....
591 posted on 03/21/2002 11:20:00 AM PST by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
but that may not be true either. we also had 'rumors' of an excessively bleached RV, and search dogs that went only to DWs house, and 'no dancing' between DW and BvD. All interesting lines of thought, but proven wrong. hopefully the truth will out.

Motive:Means:Opportunity. Those are required. The timeline is the key; it's a glaring hole in the prosecution's case, for now. And motive aint exactly clear-cut either.

592 posted on 03/21/2002 11:22:43 AM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: fnord
I find the gardner story hard to swallow as I would think BVD would know about it and so would the police by now, and her testimony would have been different...but you never know..surprises happen..I find it easier to believe someone saw Danielle in the MH before as she was IMO not that well watched by mommy..
593 posted on 03/21/2002 11:41:59 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty
Mrs Liberty, no I you were right.. It's saying that the civilian authority gets to keep him/her until they are through..and they agree to inform the command the status after the trial or whatever. I think! (LOL) I just wish they'd explain some where why they took the charges off the sheriff's website. was it because of error? because they don't have jurisdiction.. ?? I think you have it pegged..they don't have jurisdiction to charge and enforce military codes/laws.
594 posted on 03/21/2002 11:45:11 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty
Mrs Liberty, no I *believe* you were right..
595 posted on 03/21/2002 11:45:46 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: all
Does anyone else wonder about when Brenda recalled that Danielle had pulled things onto her bed with her that night - a beanbag chair and a stuffed animal I believe. Was this stuff there when Damon tucked her into bed? Was it normal for Danielle to do this? If no - then whoever took Danielle had to do it. Why?

To me, this sounds like something that a little kid who ran away would do.

About the alleged "Daddy I'm sorry - Daddy please love me" note - wasn't it supposed to be a piece of a page that was torn from her journal? Where's the rest of that or those pages? Could it have been a runaway note with lots of reasons for the runaway? But why keep just that part and not get rid of it all if it was incriminating for Damon?

I wonder what the statistics are for little kids running away? I know it doesn't seem likely that she ran away - she didn't pack or take anything with her that we know of (like money, or extra clothes in a backpack) - but with the lack of evidence of an intruder in the house - it almost seems as though she could've just left on her own.

596 posted on 03/21/2002 11:50:03 AM PST by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm right, I'm right! Lalala!
597 posted on 03/21/2002 11:51:19 AM PST by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Possibility...she wandered out in the night...and into the arms of a predator.
598 posted on 03/21/2002 11:52:57 AM PST by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: mommya
I ran away once. I was four, I made it to the end of the street. My mother and my aunt still tell that story.

That would explain the jammies in the house. It could explain the first alarm light as well. And the second light was because of the party goers.

Brenda could have saved that part of her note because by itself if she were still at home it would be meaningless. With her gone it's a plea for CPS. Just my 1/2 cent.

599 posted on 03/21/2002 12:09:32 PM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty
But who is the predator?
600 posted on 03/21/2002 12:10:11 PM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 821-837 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson