Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
nor can it be argued that any nation this century apart from Japan has posed such a threat

Other than a direct attack on American citizens on American soil, the gruesome murder of an American reporter and threats to unleash nuclear and chemical weapons on America, those Al Qaeda guys and their supporters in other countries are really pretty nice people, huh?

40 posted on 03/19/2002 12:42:19 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
I can appreciate Demidog's position. I think the issue boils down to who determines what the imminent threat to our nations is and what the criteria used are. Please see my #31. I maintain that Demidog will never have the opportunity to test his beliefs about military intervention because no one with that set of beliefs will ever be elected to the appropriate position of authority. The electorate will never settle for that level of risk to our sovereignity. Therefore, he can argue from an irrefutable position not because it is necessarily correct but because it can never be tested.
44 posted on 03/19/2002 12:47:12 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: kidd
So is it your contention that it is America's responsibility to rid the world of people who aren't nice?
45 posted on 03/19/2002 12:47:16 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson