Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
Only when they pose an eminant threat against the U.S.

Actually, the term is "imminent threat". Nonetheless, can you clarify what constitutes an imminent threat? How would you define it and who would determine it?

26 posted on 03/19/2002 11:45:09 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: johniegrad
Forces on the Mexican or Canadian border. Forces on either seabord. Forces on the border of Alaska. Forces inbound to Hawaii. Missiles fired from any nation in an attempt to attack the U.S.

That about covers it. Any of those is an act of war and merit a swift and deadly response.

It's easy to figure out if you just imagine what course of action you are allowed to take when you are yourself threatened. When are you as an individual allowed to use deadly force?

28 posted on 03/19/2002 11:54:57 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson