[xm177e2]

No, I'm not opposed to all morality.

But painting all college girls who have promiscuous sex as "sluts" (as this article did) is wrong. The article wasn't making a social point about the damage promiscuity does to society, it was just written by a guy who wanted to vent his anger for women.

Not all girls who are promiscuous are irresponsible with birth control, and there are better methods of birth control than the pill. You can be against promiscuity without demonizing these girls as whores and sluts.

And there are plenty of responsible people in society who are also promiscuous. The two are not mutually exclusive.

[wardaddy]

I do not necessarily think they are all sluts(some are) and of course they are not unpaid whores. My only concern is what I percieve to be a destructive impact on society and future families which are the foundation upon which the most successful civilizations the world has seen are borne.

Men who utilize such willing drunken girls are no better.

[wardaddy]

Maybe ..on your last comment but I forgot who said: If a man's wife can't trust him not to screw around , how can I?

A political leader or general of some sort I recall.

That issue is rather complicated.

[Campion]

And there are plenty of responsible people in society who are also promiscuous.

And there are plenty of responsible STDs responsible for infecting those responsible, promiscuous people with responsible diseases whose consequences they will be responsible for for the rest of their lives.

Something like 1/3 of all the single Americans between 20 and 40 have genital herpes. There's no cure. Think about that statistic, and see how "responsible" you feel about promiscuity.