Yeah, what's up with this? Somebody is going to say he was at a Catholic church, right?
Or would you rather have Clinton/Gore back?
I've learned that when complaints are given without subsequent solutions, stop listening. Why? Because it's not problem solving, only complaining. I have enough to complain about in my own life and have better things to do than to waste time listening to others' complaints.
Maybe, like many of us pro-lifer's, he is in favor of incrementally turning back abortion, just like abortion incrementally was legitimized.
We use dead bodies all the time for scientific research. I don't see dead embryos as being all that different.
As to promoting pro-abortion people to high positions, if that person has no say in the abortion issue, like Condi Rice or Christine Whitman, who cares? Besides, I would hardly call them advocates.
Would I vote for such a man. Considering the alternative offered, absolutely. Is he my perfect choice? Nope. Is he a million times better than Al Gore? You betcha.
Sounds like a critian thing to do.
Furthermore, he authorized the practice of using dead human embryos as guinea pigs for scientific research
Stem cells are not embryos.
Despite calling himself a "conservative," this man increased the size and scope of government to record highs.
Haven't seen any "conservatives" downsizing government in a long time.
He is also in the process of helping to make this terrorist the president of his very own, newly-established country.
Only if this terrorist is elected.
In other words, he knowingly chose to cover up this criminal conduct.
He chose to restore integrety to the predency.
Knowing that illegal aliens pose a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, this man pressured Congress to pass a bill granting amnesty to these very same aliens.
Pressured??? I wish he would start pressuring Congress.
Voted for him before and look forward to voting for him again.
This man professed to be pro-life, but he never promoted any pro-life legislation. Furthermore, he authorized the practice of using dead human embryos as guinea pigs for scientific research. He also promoted several pro-abortion advocates to high public office.
This man also allows organ harvesting to occur among the dead every day. Furthermore, his pro-abortion officials have offices like "National Security Advisor," where they counsel pregnant women daily. And how dare he cut off funding to the pro-life abortion clinics overseas.
Despite calling himself a "conservative," this man increased the size and scope of government to record highs. He even teamed up with ultra-liberals to pass the biggest expansion ever of government's role in education.
Yeah, he screwed up there.
Knowing that a certain Middle Eastern terrorist actually murdered Americans and Israelis, this man actively lobbied for the terrorist's safety and helped to perpetuate the terrorist's position as the leader of a known radical terrorist group. He is also in the process of helping to make this terrorist the president of his very own, newly-established country.
And, in the process, avoided a bloody civil war among the terrorists that would have resulted had the terrorist-president been killed. This war would have claimed many more civilian lives. And, it still hasn't been decided if the terrorist state will even be created, or why it will be created, how long it will last before it declares war on Israel, and how long it will take Israel to re-conquer and annex it back.
Knowing that criminal conduct took place within the highest levels of government, this man ordered his Justice Department to not investigate the crimes or turn over evidence already gathered regarding this criminal conduct. In other words, he knowingly chose to cover up this criminal conduct. He also refuses to hold himself, or any of his subordinates, accountable to the courts or to the American people for decisions that have the appearance of conflict of interest or unconstitutionality.
Huh? Whitewater? or Enron? or just confused?
Knowing that illegal aliens pose a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, this man pressured Congress to pass a bill granting amnesty to these very same aliens.
Well, he said no blanket amnesty, and right now this bill is exposing the true racists in the senate for what they are.
This man refused to help a Christian freedom fighter in Africa, which resulted in the murder of the freedom fighter by Communist guerillas. He then invited the leader of the Marxist murderers to the White House for a private meeting only days after the abandoned freedom fighter's death. Furthermore, this man refuses to assist suffering, persecuted peoples in another African nation because the industry to which his family is intricately connected is doing business with the tyrannical government in power there.
And let us not forget that we helped another marxist defeat a "Christian" in Europe sixty years ago. Or that the deputy Prime Minister of Iraq, Tariq Aziz, is a "Christian." Or that Lebanese "Christians" cheered at the destruction of the WTC. And God forbid that the leader of a country should every invite the leader of another country for talks.
And then, if you want this man to be conservative (as per no.3), then he did the "conservative" thing by not getting involved in another country's internal civil war.
Knowing that a certain Islamic country is a notorious supplier and promoter of terrorists like Osama Bin Laden and that this nation routinely persecutes and murders Christians within its own borders, this man invited this country's Crown Prince to his ranch for a private meeting. Again, it is noteworthy that this country is also intricately connected to the family business and personal fortune of this man.
Again, its horrible that this man should meet with a leader of another country, especially when we're trying to remove that Christian fellow Tariq and the three people above him from power in the neighboring country.
Would I believe that man?
Would I be more or less inclined to think highly of his stated faith?
For that matter, minister Baldwin, have you 'remonstrated him in private' as dictated by the Bible? Or are you just casting stones, as one of the new Pharisees?
You neglected to mention that this man's wife and his mother are both pro-abortion, or pro-choice, or whatever you want to call legalized murder.
Personally, I'd rather see the dems in power over all branches with large majorities. It won't be until this behemoth we call a government gets so large, so demanding, and so controlling that a large number of people just can't stand it anymore that we will ever see any kind of change. It's human nature, "...all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed." The democrats will get us where we will eventually end up much faster than the republicrats and maybe then people will remember what our Founders told us about the nature of government.