So, my asking you to clarify your stance (you've been all over the place on this) is indicative of dishonest debate? That would be you debating dishonestly, wouldn't it?
No.
That your comprehension is failing isn't an indication of any lack of clarity on my part.
At #384 I asked you:
Do you know the difference between logically valid, and true?
You've shown no evidence or indication that an answer in the affirmative would be true.
LOL! That's funny!
One of us is saying millions and then denying that they said millions.
One of us is attributing quotes to Bush that he admittedly made up himelf, and then calling Bush a liar for it.
One of us is calling a fine a fee, and an extension an amnesty.
I guess I'm done with you, you are down to name-calling now.