1. I posted an article from Jane's, that had initially been posted on www.undernews (which is run by a liberal Sam Smith, who is nevertheless an honest thinker - anti-Clinton, pro 2nd amendment, etc.)
2. The link that Mr. Smith posted was to the "freebie" site link you mention. When a poster pointed that out to me, I then followed to the Jane's cite and posted the actual full link directly to Jane's.
3. I also noted where I had originally got the article from.
4. The article was real and did appear on Jane's as posted. It contained info earlier reported in other publications, but not mainstream media, which has "spiked" the story. There is substantial reason to believe it is being spiked due to political reasons and not journalistic ones. That in itself is newsworthy.
5. I realize that Israeli supporters feel that their State is under worldwide attack now more than ever and that any criticism of Israel in any way, especially by Americans is nothing short of treasonours in their eyes. Please understand, I've always felt that the US will go to nuclear war to support Israel no matter what, but in return, the US should know exactly what Israel is doing, especially since we are all trying to figure out what happened on 9/11 and why it was not prevented when it should have been. If Israel had knowledge of the event and the Al-Queda presence in the US, it should be investigated. There is compelling veidence that a LOT of people, some w/Israeli ties, knew in advance.
So if you want to maintain your campaign against me of being a propagandist for ? Al-qUEDA? Bin-Laden? ARAFAT? The Saudis? The Neo-nazis? good luck. Your knee-jerk reactions to any form of inquiry only makes you look like a thin-skinned reactionary thug, blindlessly casting about like a fool