Sheriff says 'gun nut' concealing the truth

Tri-Valley Herald ^ | 17 March 2002 | Dwight King-Leatham

[Texaggie79]

Then I hope you reported tpaine when he brought it up in #19. I'm just defending myself from his lies.

[antaresequity]

unloading some of his frustration

Curious choice of words

[tpaine]

Good grief, -- now you are reduced to the use of CJ's demented 'ideolog' lines.

Get more rest aggie, - its too early in the day to stoop so low.

[Texaggie79]

I think, since Hannity and Colmes is so popular on Fpx News, tpaine and I should get a FR radio show going. Libertarians are more fun than Liberals anyway.

[antaresequity]

that is the main reason they choose to be Libertarian?

What a ridiculous statement. Does that mean (assumes Republican) that the party you are member of is largely staffed by those who oppose drug legalization?

Such blanket dispersions do little for the debate.

[Stew Padasso]

"Show me that every single LP member is a non drug using ideologue"

Burden of proof is on you to prove this: "because they want to do them." And other smears populating this thread.

[Eagle Eye]

Sorry, that's not the way I see it and I'm telling you because I want to be upfront about it.

From here on out, when you start calling anyone drug users without accurately specifying about whom you are speaking, I'll hit abuse. We don't need your contributions of divisiveness.

If you want to talk about guns, ccw, etc, stay on this thread. If not, why don't you leave?

[Texaggie79]

Such blanket dispersions do little for the debate.

Where is the blanket? Please show me.

[Texaggie79]

Show me anyone on here that I have called a drug user.

You people are getting desperate.

[antaresequity]

Can you not even have the dignity to admit that many in the LP are drug users and that is the main reason they choose to be Libertarian?

I would say that is a pretty broad brush you wield, and you seem to be deft at narrow stokes.

[Texaggie79]

I already gave you the proof of me and my friends. That already qualifies as some. I have fully admitted to undesirables in my party, why can't you guys simply admit to quacks in yours?

[Texaggie79]

Broad? many is not most, Many in the Repubs are Rino Constitutional shredding punks.

[Eagle Eye]

If you want to talk about guns, ccw, etc, stay on this thread. If not, why don't you leave?

[nunya bidness]

Just type the words, "I like guns."

You can do it.

[Texaggie79]

Guns are cool!!!!!

[Texaggie79]

Had I not been challenged I would have been on here in the first place. Stop replying to me and you won't see me.

[antaresequity]

Stop replying to me and you won't see me.

TAG!....your it....neneneneeer neenener

[tpaine]

If you don't want to be a hypocrite, then support the legal private ownership of nukes.

Sorry, but you will first have to explain your dementia on this subject, and its relationship to prohibitive unconstitutional state laws on guns, drugs or other mildly dangerous types of property that are constitutionally protected. [see the 9th].

The police power of the state is fully justified to write criminal law restricting private possession of virtually uncontrolable 'CBN' type weapons of mass destruction. -- This is a rational libertarian use of force, imo.

[Texaggie79]

This is a rational libertarian use of force, imo.

Well that's nice and all, but we are talking about the Constitution. How is it constitutional to ban THAT particular property, yet unconstitutional to ban the other? Seems to me that you are saying that the USC is based on your rational. I would just like to see where it says that.

See Eagle Eye, we are talking about the 2nd. Are nukes included?

[tpaine]

Sorry aggie, I'll not be an 'enabler' for your delusions of FreepRadio grandeur.

I suggest a comic monolog.