Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Cave on Campaign Finance
NewsMax ^ | 3/19/02 | (UPI)

Posted on 03/18/2002 3:25:16 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Top Republican aides predicted Monday that an expected parliamentary fight over a campaign finance bill opposed by most Republicans as unconstitutional would be "anti-climatic."

"I expect that the bill will receive a cloture vote on Wednesday and be voted into law on Thursday," said a top Republican aide. "The horrible fight everyone expects will probably be anti-climatic."

The Republican leadership in the Senate strongly opposes the bill, which would ban unregulated donations to political parties and limit issue advertising before elections. It had threatened to filibuster the bill. But GOP aides said Monday that the bill would pass and that there might be few members willing to delay the inevitable.

Senate plurality leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said Friday that any attempt by the Republicans to delay the campaign finance vote would result in the Senate "working around the clock." Democrats then arranged a photo opportunity of cots and mattresses being delivered to the Capitol so that senators could take naps during the non-stop debate. Republican aides dismissed the move as unnecessary.

"I think Daschle is grandstanding on this one," the senior GOP aide said. "He knows that we won't need any cots."

Although the campaign finance bill - introduced and supported by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis. - has the simple majority votes needed for passage, any bill in the Senate needs 60 votes to end debate, or it can be filibustered. Current vote counts put the number of senators willing to vote to end debate at about 60, leaving passage virtually assured, according to aides from both parties. But according to Senate rules, a vote to end debate is usually followed by 30 hours of final debate. Daschle has said he would be willing to keep the Senate in session nonstop if Republicans did not agree to waive the 30 hours. Several aides to Republican senators said that such a maneuver, though possible, seemed unlikely.

Payback for Pickering? Don't Be on It

But one aide did warn that the Senate Judiciary Committee's refusal last week to let the full Senate vote on District Judge Charles Pickering, a close friend of Republican Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., had caused a lot of tension between the leadership of both parties that could explode. The aide also said that no behind-the-scenes discussions between the parties to relieve the tension had taken place.

"We ain't talking," he said.

The Senate passed its original version of McCain-Feingold last year 59 to 41, but several senators who voted against the measure said they would vote for cloture. The Senate will consider a new version of that bill that passed the House in February and expects not to consider amendments to that bill, according to staff with the Democrat leadership.

Any amendment would force the bill to go to a bipartisan, bicameral conference committee, where Republicans would get another shot at defeating or changing the legislation.

Although he has expressed concerns about a ban on "soft-money" donations to political parties, President Bush has indicated that he will sign McCain-Feingold if it passes Congress.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: campaign; silenceamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is so angering....
61 posted on 03/18/2002 7:19:28 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
I see Hillary.
62 posted on 03/18/2002 7:19:40 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MississippiDeltaDawg
*Princess and the Pea*

My thoughts EXACTLY!

63 posted on 03/18/2002 8:42:02 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
BTTT
64 posted on 03/19/2002 12:15:22 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cable225
"I'll never vote for Bush again "

I'll agree with you that far but I don't know about the rest. Keyes is articulate and sincere rather than a blowhard.

Regarding Buchanan, I can't figure out why some say he's not a conservative. The only thing I have ever found is that he is anti-NAFTA, as are lots of other conservatives. I would appreciate hearing from you why you don't consider him a conservative because I've never understood these views.

Regards

65 posted on 03/19/2002 5:03:42 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You may be right about not being able to beat Bush. Even Reagan couldn't beat Ford. But you can count on me trying my best with my mouth and my money to turn this CINO (Conservative in name only) back into a private citizen when he signs CFR.
66 posted on 03/19/2002 5:07:10 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: baxter999
"I'll agree with you that far but I don't know about the rest. "

Actually, I don't think we're in agreement at all. I suggest you re-read my post.

I said there is a "line in the sand" crowd here on FR that likes to throw around how they'll never vote for Bush again. I also said I don't think Bush ever had their vote in the first place.

GWB not only got my vote in 2000, he's got it in 2004. I'm just sorry I can't vote for him today.

And Pat's not a conservative any more. I still respect some of what he says, but he's moved too far left on too many issues to be considered anything but a populist.

67 posted on 03/19/2002 5:26:02 PM PST by Cable225
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce

Statement by the President

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002
Statement by the President

Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system. The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.

The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions. I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.

###

Return to this article at:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020320-21.html


The George W. Bush Lie

ABC News's This Week on January 23, 2000:

GEORGE F. WILL: I want to see if you agree with those who say it would be bad for the First Amendment? I know you're not a lawyer, you say that with some pride, but do you think a president, and we've got a lot of non-lawyer presidents, has a duty to make an independent judgment of what is and is not constitutional, and veto bills that, in his judgment, he thinks are unconstitutional?

GOV. BUSH: I do.

WILL: In which case, would you veto the McCain-Feingold bill, or the Shays-Meehan bill?

BUSH: That's an interesting question. I — I — yes I would.
Source

LIAR - George W. Bush


68 posted on 03/22/2002 2:43:23 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Uncle Bill
National Review has archived that interview

Regards.

70 posted on 03/22/2002 4:11:01 PM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Thanks Harry.


71 posted on 03/22/2002 4:27:35 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
"How many of us were told our tinfoil hats were on to tight when we tried to warn them about Bush? He doesn't work in the light of day. He is better suited for the dark of the moon."

So true, so true. Now they're torturing themselves trying to explain it all.

72 posted on 03/25/2002 10:16:52 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

To: D Joyce
Another bump.
74 posted on 03/26/2002 3:32:38 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson