Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wcbtinman
I'm confused as to whether you agree or disagree with me. Certainly the "revenue raising" nature of the NFA was the legal excuse not to declare it unconstitutional. I submit that the Supreme Court upheld NFA because it intended to curtail our Second Amendment rights in 1939. We might find that the Supreme Court intends to curtail our rights by any means possible in future cases.
35 posted on 03/19/2002 2:36:54 PM PST by Mike Johnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Johnson
I think we agree.
36 posted on 03/19/2002 3:20:45 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson