Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rowdee
I cannot for the life of me fathom how a doctor or nurse or even a hospital custodian could stand by and watch an innocent human baby expire.

It does make you shidder, doesn't it? How low we have sunk into depravity as a nation to allow this!

We must continue to fight for the right to life. But we must also pray to God for forgiveness. Maybe he will have mercy on us.

14 posted on 03/18/2002 3:29:37 PM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Keyes For President
It does make you shidder, doesn't it?

Makes me shudder too!

15 posted on 03/18/2002 3:30:56 PM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Keyes For President
It does make you shidder, doesn't it? How low we have sunk into depravity as a nation to allow this!

It seems our society parallels Ancient Rome in many ways, unfortunately.

Thank you for posting this article. This is the first I've heard of Jill Stanek.

17 posted on 03/18/2002 4:48:44 PM PST by Helix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Keyes For President
The whole legal philosophy behind Roe v. Wade simply stinks and should be considered unconstitutional for a couple of reasons.

First, it is unquestionable that when the Declaration of Independence states that all men have the right to "life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," this right also extends to the unborn. The Supreme Court had no right to supercede state law in this Texas case, nor had they the right to determine when life begins.

Second, the entire legal philosophy is unconstitutional and does not even make sense. The Court based their ruling under the judicial-made philosophy of the right to privacy, which is a right that is found nowhere in the U.S. Constitution. The 4th Amendment protects us from illegal search and seizure, but the Founders did not include the absolute right to privacy for a reason; this would be a dangerous breeding ground for criminal activity and thwarted police investigations. Anway, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Griswold v. Connecticut, that this was a right that needed to be made up in order to supercede state contraceptive laws that were in place at the time. In making up this right to absolute privacy, this was the court's exact wording in the Griswold case: "The specific guarantees in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution have peaunumbras formed by emanations, which create zones of privacy." That is the most crazy legal wording I have ever heard, peaunumbras are basically the rays of light that come off the sun--that was their legal analogy, philosophy, and justification for making up this right to privacy when American citizens are already protected by Probable Cause and the 4th Amendment. In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court used this same philosophy to make abortion constitutional and legal in all states.

20 posted on 03/18/2002 5:29:12 PM PST by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson