To: Brookhaven
Great idea, but why stop with ad hominem? In debate, I find that the tu quoque, argumentum ad vericundium and ergo hoc post propter hoc are the real killers.
5 posted on
03/18/2002 8:54:16 AM PST by
Melas
To: Melas
Great idea, but why stop with ad hominem? I was thinking of posting a different one every few days. I thought it would sink in better that way.
Given the way politicians use (or abuse) language to get their point across, everyone needs to have a basic understanding of logic and fallacies if they don't want to be lead around like sheep.
To: Melas
No, the only possible choice is between name-calling and false dichotomies!
9 posted on
03/18/2002 9:05:06 AM PST by
mrsmith
To: Melas
"Great idea, but why stop with ad hominem? In debate, I find that the tu quoque, argumentum ad vericundium and ergo hoc post propter hoc are the real killers."
Sure. You can always use truth as a last resort.
To: Melas
argumentum ad vericundiumHey, watch your language!
58 posted on
03/18/2002 3:44:07 PM PST by
mrustow
To: Melas
Great idea, but why stop with ad hominem? In debate, I find that the tu quoque, argumentum ad vericundium and ergo hoc post propter hoc are the real killers. Oh yeah? What do you know about argument?!
;^)
60 posted on
03/18/2002 6:17:14 PM PST by
DrNo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson